Literature DB >> 11045260

The role of peritoneal dialysis catheter configuration in preventing catheter tip migration.

M F Gadallah1, J Mignone, C Torres, G Ramdeen, A Pervez.   

Abstract

Migration of the peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheter from the pelvis to the upper abdomen frequently results in peritoneal dialysis failure and removal of the catheter. Previous studies compared PD catheter survival in various catheter configurations. These studies included single-cuff and double-cuff, straight-end and curled-end catheters, and showed an incidence of catheter migration ranging from 5%-35% depending on the catheter type. Recent studies demonstrated that the double-cuff, Swan-neck, curled-end configuration is associated with a considerably lower incidence of migration. Most of these studies, however, had a small patient sample or no control group, or they compared nonequivalent catheters (for example, Swan-neck, curled-end versus straight, non-curled-end). Over a six-year period, we examined two similar double-cuff, curled-end catheters: Group I catheters had a straight segment between the two cuffs, and Group II catheters had a 60 degrees Swan-neck bend between the two cuffs (Quinton Instrument Co., Bothell, WA, U.S.A.). The two catheters were identical, except for the presence or absence of the Swan-neck bend. All catheters were placed by the closed laparoscopic technique. In the two groups of patients in whom the catheters were implanted, no statistically significant difference was observed in primary disease, age, sex, race, weight, prior abdominal surgery, or duration of dialysis before catheter migration. In group I, 33 of the 219 patients developed catheter migration (15%); in group II, 2 patients of 243 patients developed catheter migration (less than 1%, p = 0.002). In conclusion, the Swan-neck configuration presents an independent factor in preventing PD catheter migration. Review of previous studies and the data from our study, show that double-cuff, curled-end, Swan-neck PD catheters are superior to other catheters in regard to prevention of catheter migration and should be the catheter of choice in PD patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11045260

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Perit Dial        ISSN: 1197-8554


  5 in total

1.  Migration of Tenckhoff catheter into an occult inguinal hernia.

Authors:  C W Teoh; R Haydar; J Gillick; M Waldron; N M Dolan; A Awan; M Riordan
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.756

2.  Peritoneal Dialysis Access Revision in Children: Causes, Interventions, and Outcomes.

Authors:  Dagmara Borzych-Duzalka; T Fazil Aki; Marta Azocar; Colin White; Elizabeth Harvey; Sevgi Mir; Marta Adragna; Erkin Serdaroglu; Rajiv Sinha; Charlotte Samaille; Juan Jose Vanegas; Jameela Kari; Lorena Barbosa; Arvind Bagga; Monica Galanti; Onder Yavascan; Giovanna Leozappa; Maria Szczepanska; Karel Vondrak; Kei-Chiu Tse; Franz Schaefer; Bradley A Warady
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 3.  Management of Peritoneal Dialysis Catheters That Erode Into Bowel: Two Pediatric Case Reports and a Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Troy A Markel; Karen W West
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2016 11-12       Impact factor: 1.756

4.  Comparison of conventional straight and swan-neck straight catheters inserted by percutaneous method for continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis: a single-center study.

Authors:  Shivendra Singh; Jai Prakash; R G Singh; P K Dole; Pragya Pant
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 2.370

5.  Association between different peritoneal dialysis catheter placement methods and short-term postoperative complications.

Authors:  Yibo Ma; Shuiqing Liu; Min Yang; Yun Zou; Dong Xue; Yanping Liu; Yufeng Wang; Xiao Xie; Hui Chen
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 2.388

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.