R A Alberico1, P Loud, J Pollina, W Greco, M Patel, R Klufas. 1. Department of Radiology, Neuroradiology/Head and Neck Imaging, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Elm St. and Carlton St., Buffalo, NY 14263, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to evaluate thick-section reformatted helical CT of the brain base as a technique for reducing skull base-related artifacts and to compare it with conventional CT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-three patients with suspected intracranial abnormalities related to the brain base, as determined either by clinical examination or at the time of imaging, were evaluated with contrast-enhanced conventional CT of the brain (5-mm collimation, 140 kVp, 170 mA, 2-sec rotation time) and reformatted helical CT (1-mm collimation, 1.5 pitch, 120 kVp, 220 mA). Helical sections were reformatted to a thickness of 5 mm by a volume-averaging algorithm using a computer workstation. Three observers retrospectively and blindly reviewed the images and qualitatively scored artifacts at the foramen magnum, middle cranial fossa, anterior cranial fossa, interpetrous region, and internal occipital protuberance. Image graininess and observer confidence were also scored. Paired statistical analyses using score differences in each patient were possible. RESULTS: Reformatted helical CT reduced skull base-related artifacts across all five anatomic regions (p < 0.05). The foramen magnum showed the greatest reduction in artifacts and the anterior cranial fossa the least. Image graininess was increased on reformatted CT compared with conventional CT (p < 0.05), but observer confidence remained higher for reformatted CT (p < 0.05). Total additional scan time was 3.15 +/- 0.38 min with 5.3 +/- 1.2 min required for reformatting. CONCLUSION: Reformatted CT significantly decreases skull base-related artifacts in the brain, improving confidence in evaluation of the brain base and adding an average of only 8.45 +/- 1.6 min of scanning and processing time to each examination.
OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to evaluate thick-section reformatted helical CT of the brain base as a technique for reducing skull base-related artifacts and to compare it with conventional CT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-three patients with suspected intracranial abnormalities related to the brain base, as determined either by clinical examination or at the time of imaging, were evaluated with contrast-enhanced conventional CT of the brain (5-mm collimation, 140 kVp, 170 mA, 2-sec rotation time) and reformatted helical CT (1-mm collimation, 1.5 pitch, 120 kVp, 220 mA). Helical sections were reformatted to a thickness of 5 mm by a volume-averaging algorithm using a computer workstation. Three observers retrospectively and blindly reviewed the images and qualitatively scored artifacts at the foramen magnum, middle cranial fossa, anterior cranial fossa, interpetrous region, and internal occipital protuberance. Image graininess and observer confidence were also scored. Paired statistical analyses using score differences in each patient were possible. RESULTS: Reformatted helical CT reduced skull base-related artifacts across all five anatomic regions (p < 0.05). The foramen magnum showed the greatest reduction in artifacts and the anterior cranial fossa the least. Image graininess was increased on reformatted CT compared with conventional CT (p < 0.05), but observer confidence remained higher for reformatted CT (p < 0.05). Total additional scan time was 3.15 +/- 0.38 min with 5.3 +/- 1.2 min required for reformatting. CONCLUSION: Reformatted CT significantly decreases skull base-related artifacts in the brain, improving confidence in evaluation of the brain base and adding an average of only 8.45 +/- 1.6 min of scanning and processing time to each examination.
Authors: M van Straten; H W Venema; C B L M Majoie; N J M Freling; C A Grimbergen; G J den Heeten Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2007-03 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Shervin Kamalian; Wendy L Atkinson; Lauren A Florin; Stuart R Pomerantz; Michael H Lev; Javier M Romero Journal: Emerg Radiol Date: 2014-01-28
Authors: Holger Wenz; Máté E Maros; Mathias Meyer; Alex Förster; Holger Haubenreisser; Stefan Kurth; Stefan O Schoenberg; Thomas Flohr; Christianne Leidecker; Christoph Groden; Johann Scharf; Thomas Henzler Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-08-19 Impact factor: 3.240