Literature DB >> 11043559

Current orientation induced by magnetic stimulation influences a cognitive task.

A C Hill1, N J Davey, C Kennard.   

Abstract

The direction of the current induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over the motor cortex has been observed to influence the threshold and latency of evoked muscle responses. This study investigates the effect of TMS-induced current orientation (ICO) over the prefrontal cortex, on a specific cognitive task (memory-guided saccade). TMS was applied with a figure-of-eight coil, placed at one of eight different orientations over the prefrontal cortex. The most effective ICO was antero-lateral, which is a different optimal ICO from that seen over the hand area of the motor cortex. This demonstrates that ICO can alter the effect of TMS on cognitive functions and that ICO is an independent variable that should not be ignored when designing TMS studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11043559     DOI: 10.1097/00001756-200009280-00041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroreport        ISSN: 0959-4965            Impact factor:   1.837


  8 in total

Review 1.  A checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies using transcranial magnetic stimulation to study the motor system: an international consensus study.

Authors:  Lucy Chipchase; Siobhan Schabrun; Leonardo Cohen; Paul Hodges; Michael Ridding; John Rothwell; Janet Taylor; Ulf Ziemann
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-05-28       Impact factor: 3.708

2.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation and the challenge of coil placement: a comparison of conventional and stereotaxic neuronavigational strategies.

Authors:  Roland Sparing; Dorothee Buelte; Ingo G Meister; Tomás Paus; Gereon R Fink
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  EEG responses to TMS are sensitive to changes in the perturbation parameters and repeatable over time.

Authors:  Silvia Casarotto; Leonor J Romero Lauro; Valentina Bellina; Adenauer G Casali; Mario Rosanova; Andrea Pigorini; Stefano Defendi; Maurizio Mariotti; Marcello Massimini
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-04-22       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  How does transcranial magnetic stimulation modify neuronal activity in the brain? Implications for studies of cognition.

Authors:  Hartwig R Siebner; Gesa Hartwigsen; Tanja Kassuba; John C Rothwell
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2009-03-03       Impact factor: 4.027

5.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation intensities in cognitive paradigms.

Authors:  Jakob A Kaminski; Franziska M Korb; Arno Villringer; Derek V M Ott
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Reliability of Motor Evoked Potentials Induced by Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: The Effects of Initial Motor Evoked Potentials Removal.

Authors:  Fahimeh Hashemirad; Maryam Zoghi; Paul B Fitzgerald; Shapour Jaberzadeh
Journal:  Basic Clin Neurosci       Date:  2017-01

7.  Site-Specific Effects of Online rTMS during a Working Memory Task in Healthy Older Adults.

Authors:  Lysianne Beynel; Simon W Davis; Courtney A Crowell; Moritz Dannhauer; Wesley Lim; Hannah Palmer; Susan A Hilbig; Alexandra Brito; Connor Hile; Bruce Luber; Sarah H Lisanby; Angel V Peterchev; Roberto Cabeza; Lawrence G Appelbaum
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2020-04-27

8.  Electronically switchable sham transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) system.

Authors:  Fumiko Hoeft; Daw-An Wu; Arvel Hernandez; Gary H Glover; Shinsuke Shimojo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-04-09       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.