Literature DB >> 11043102

Metastatic disease of the femur. Surgical management.

W G Ward1, J Spang, D Howe.   

Abstract

Treatment of actual or impending pathologic fractures of the femur provides the senior author with some of the most rewarding surgical interventions of his practice. The patients' survival outlook is not changed, but their quality of life is enhanced significantly. Most health care providers usually provide the metastatic cancer patient only temporary symptomatic relief, at best, and often at the expense of continued pain, suffering, or sickness, such as is seen with chemotherapy-associated morbidity. Patients with metastatic bone disease are usually incredibly grateful for the restoration of function and diminution of their pain that results from the proper operation on metastatic bone disease. These patients typically are among the most appreciative patients and often express their gratitude when seen in follow-up in the clinic or office. Despite their metastatic disease state, their usual enthusiasm is uplifting to the surgeon and to the staff. To help a patient be pain-free and functional in the waning days of his or her life affords the patient, the physician, and the physician's staff with an emotionally rewarding experience and one that is well worth the time and effort required to care for these patients. By following the techniques outlined in this article, most patients with metastatic disease of the femur can be appropriately managed with excellent results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11043102     DOI: 10.1016/s0030-5898(05)70181-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am        ISSN: 0030-5898            Impact factor:   2.472


  6 in total

1.  Prophylactic stabilization for bone metastases, myeloma, or lymphoma: do we need to protect the entire bone?

Authors:  Hasham M Alvi; Timothy A Damron
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-10-27       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  MRI Evaluation of Suspected Pathologic Fracture at the Extremities from Metastasis: Diagnostic Value of Added Diffusion-Weighted Imaging.

Authors:  Sun Young Park; Min Hee Lee; Ji Young Jeon; Hye Won Chung; Sang Hoon Lee; Myung Jin Shin
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 3.500

3.  Intramedullary nailing vs modular megaprosthesis in extracapsular metastases of proximal femur: clinical outcomes and complication in a retrospective study.

Authors:  Raffaele Vitiello; Carlo Perisano; Tommaso Greco; Luigi Cianni; Chiara Polichetti; Rocco Maria Comodo; Ivan De Martino; Vincenzo La Vergata; Giulio Maccauro
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-09-13       Impact factor: 2.562

4.  Cemented vs uncemented megaprostheses in proximal femur metastases: a multicentric comparative study.

Authors:  Maria Serena Oliva; Francesco Muratori; Raffaele Vitiello; Antonio Ziranu; Lorenzo Foschi; Giuseppe Rovere; Cesare Meschini; Domenico Andrea Campanacci; Giulio Maccauro
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-09-06       Impact factor: 2.562

5.  Metastatic adenocarcinoma of Proximal Femur treated by Custom made Hip Prosthesis.

Authors:  Chandra Prakash Pal; Surabhi Gupta; Deepak Kumar; Pulkesh Singh
Journal:  J Orthop Case Rep       Date:  2012 Jan-Mar

6.  Modified Unipolar Hemiarthroplasty for the Treatment of Metastatic Lesions of Proximal Femur with Pathological Fractures: Case Series of Six Patients.

Authors:  C Y Lim; S Mat-Hassan; M Awang; M F Md-Ariff; M A Hau-Abdullah
Journal:  Malays Orthop J       Date:  2019-11
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.