Literature DB >> 11042865

[Mental competence and informed consent. Clinical practice and ethical analysis].

J Vollmann1.   

Abstract

The doctrine of informed consent has become a legal and ethical standard in psychiatry today. However, ethical problems arise if patients lose the capacity to give informed consent due to their psychiatric disorders. Particularly in the field of psychiatry, the assessment of competence of informed consent to medical treatment and participation in clinical trials is a controversial issue. New empirical data suggest that a high percentage of psychiatric patients are incompetent according to defined standards for assessing their capacity to make treatment decisions. Assessing competence according to a sliding scale integrates the ethical principles of autonomy and beneficence and provides help in assessing competence in clinical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11042865     DOI: 10.1007/s001150050654

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nervenarzt        ISSN: 0028-2804            Impact factor:   1.214


  3 in total

Review 1.  The cognitive based approach of capacity assessment in psychiatry: a philosophical critique of the MacCAT-T.

Authors:  Torsten Marcus Breden; Jochen Vollmann
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2004-12

Review 2.  [Neuroethics--a future discipline?].

Authors:  G Northoff; J Witzel; B Bogerts
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 1.214

3.  [Compulsory treatment in psychiatry: an ethical analysis of the new legal regulations for clinical practice].

Authors:  J Vollmann
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 1.214

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.