Literature DB >> 11042651

A comparative study of sequential priming and mobilisation of progenitor cells with rhG-CSF alone and high-dose cyclophosphamide plus rhG-CSF.

L Meldgaard Knudsen1, L Jensen, E Gaarsdal, K Nikolaisen, H E Johnsen.   

Abstract

Stem cell mobilisation can be achieved either by administration of rhG-CSF alone or after high-dose cyclophosphamide (HDCy) plus rhG-CSF. We have compared both mobilisation procedures intra-individually in 43 patients with haematological malignancies. Furthermore, the toxicity data were registered. The CD34+ cell yield was higher after mobilisation with HDCy plus rhG-CSF than after rhG-CSF alone in 21 out of 22 patients who were actually harvested after both procedures. If a patient mobilised insufficiently after rhG-CSF alone, the yield of CD34+ cells after the following HDCy priming was lower compared to patients who mobilised sufficiently after rhG-CSF priming alone. In 12 patients with B cell malignancies a reduced number of B cells such as CD10+, CD19+, CD20+ cells in bone marrow as well as in leukapheresis products was observed after HDCy plus rhG-CSF compared to rhG-CSF alone. Toxicity data revealed HDCy as a relatively toxic priming regimen with all patients hospitalised and 74% experiencing neutropenic fever and administration of intravenous antibiotics. In two patients, seizure-like episodes were observed during cyclophosphamide bolus infusion. In conclusion, HDCy increased the yield of CD34+cell and reduced B cells in leukapheresis products indicating reduced tumour cell load compared with rhG-CSF priming alone. The efficacy of HDCy priming is limited by its profound toxicity and morbidity. Studies evaluating efficacy and safety of lower doses of cyclophosphamide are needed. Bone Marrow Transplantation (2000) 26, 717-722.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11042651     DOI: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1702609

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant        ISSN: 0268-3369            Impact factor:   5.483


  5 in total

1.  Upfront plerixafor plus G-CSF versus cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF for stem cell mobilization in multiple myeloma: efficacy and cost analysis study.

Authors:  S Afifi; N G Adel; S Devlin; E Duck; J Vanak; H Landau; D J Chung; N Lendvai; A Lesokhin; N Korde; L Reich; O Landgren; S Giralt; H Hassoun
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2016-01-04       Impact factor: 5.483

Review 2.  Pegfilgrastim vs filgrastim in PBSC mobilization for autologous hematopoietic SCT: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  M G Kim; N Han; E-K Lee; T Kim
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2015-01-12       Impact factor: 5.483

3.  Stem cell mobilization in HIV seropositive patients with lymphoma.

Authors:  Alessandro Re; Chiara Cattaneo; Cristina Skert; Pascual Balsalobre; Mariagrazia Michieli; Mark Bower; Andrés J M Ferreri; Marcus Hentrich; José M Ribera; Bernardino Allione; Philipp Schommers; Silvia Montoto; Camillo Almici; Pierino Ferremi; Mario Mazzucato; Salvatore Gattillo; Salvatore Casari; Michele Spina; José L Diez-Martin; Umberto Tirelli; Giuseppe Rossi
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2013-08-23       Impact factor: 9.941

4.  Outcomes and costs of autologous stem cell mobilization with chemotherapy plus G-CSF vs G-CSF alone.

Authors:  A D Sung; D T Grima; L M Bernard; S Brown; G Carrum; L Holmberg; M E Horwitz; J L Liesveld; J Kanda; B McClune; P Shaughnessy; G J Tricot; N J Chao
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 5.483

Review 5.  Plerixafor.

Authors:  Susan Slater
Journal:  J Adv Pract Oncol       Date:  2012-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.