Literature DB >> 11042252

Use of patches and whole body sampling for the assessment of dermal exposure.

A Soutar1, S Semple, R J Aitken, A Robertson.   

Abstract

There has been a growing awareness of the importance of dermal exposure in recent years. A wide range of techniques are employed to measure exposure, of which surrogate skin techniques such as patch sampling and whole body sampling are frequently used. One of the problems associated with dermal sampling is that different methods often produce different results due to differences in the principles involved in sample collection. As a consequence little progress towards establishing dermal exposure limits has been made. Both patches and clothing act as passive samplers and are intended to collect all of a substance deposited on them. This paper details the principles underlying patch and whole body sampling and outlines some of the advantages and disadvantages of each. A conceptual model has recently been proposed for dermal exposure and the role that surrogate techniques may play in the application of this model is discussed. Finally, suggestions are made as to how these techniques may be made more relevant and areas of future research highlighted.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11042252

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg        ISSN: 0003-4878


  6 in total

Review 1.  Dermal exposure to chemicals in the workplace: just how important is skin absorption?

Authors:  S Semple
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.402

2.  Accuracy of a semiquantitative method for Dermal Exposure Assessment (DREAM).

Authors:  B van Wendel de Joode; R Vermeulen; J J van Hemmen; W Fransman; H Kromhout
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.402

3.  An assessment of dermal exposure to semi-synthetic metal working fluids by different methods to group workers for an epidemiological study on dermatitis.

Authors:  B van Wendel de Joode; E P B Bierman; D H Brouwer; J Spithoven; H Kromhout
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.402

4.  Pesticide Exposure in Fruit-Growers: Comparing Levels and Determinants Assessed under Usual Conditions of Work (CANEPA Study) with Those Predicted by Registration Process (Agricultural Operator Exposure Model).

Authors:  Morgane Bresson; Mathilde Bureau; Jérémie Le Goff; Yannick Lecluse; Elsa Robelot; Justine Delamare; Isabelle Baldi; Pierre Lebailly
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 4.614

5.  Bystander exposure to ultra-low-volume insecticide applications used for adult mosquito management.

Authors:  Collin J Preftakes; Jerome J Schleier; Robert K D Peterson
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2011-06-14       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Measuring potential dermal transfer of a pesticide to children in a child care center.

Authors:  Elaine A Cohen Hubal; Peter P Egeghy; Kelly W Leovic; Gerry G Akland
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 9.031

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.