PURPOSE: Although infections associated with indwelling urinary catheters are common, costly, and morbid, the use of these catheters is unnecessary in more than one-third of patients. We sought to assess whether attending physicians, medical residents, and medical students are aware if their hospitalized patients have an indwelling urinary catheter, and whether physician awareness is associated with appropriate use of these catheters. METHODS: The physicians and medical students responsible for patients admitted to the medical services at four university-affiliated hospitals were given a list of the patients on their service. For each patient, the provider was asked: "As of yesterday afternoon, did this patient have an indwelling urethral catheter?" Respondents' answers were compared with the results of examining the patient. RESULTS: Among 288 physicians and students on 56 medical teams, 256 (89%) completed the survey. Of 469 patients, 117 (25%) had an indwelling catheter. There were a total of 319 provider-patient observations among these 117 patients. Overall, providers were unaware of catheterization for 88 (28%) of the 319 provider-patient observations. Unawareness rates by level of training were 21% for students, 22% for interns, 27% for residents, and 38% for attending physicians (P = 0.06). Catheter use was inappropriate in 36 (31%) of the 117 patients with a catheter. Providers were unaware of catheter use for 44 (41%) of the 108 provider-patient observations of patients who were inappropriately catheterized. Catheterization was more likely to be appropriate if respondents were aware of the catheter (odds ratio = 3.7; 95% confidence interval, 2.1 to 6.7, P <0.001). CONCLUSION: Physicians are commonly unaware that their patients have an indwelling urinary catheter. Inappropriate catheters are more often "forgotten" than appropriate ones. System-wide interventions aimed at discontinuing unnecessary catheterization seem warranted.
PURPOSE: Although infections associated with indwelling urinary catheters are common, costly, and morbid, the use of these catheters is unnecessary in more than one-third of patients. We sought to assess whether attending physicians, medical residents, and medical students are aware if their hospitalized patients have an indwelling urinary catheter, and whether physician awareness is associated with appropriate use of these catheters. METHODS: The physicians and medical students responsible for patients admitted to the medical services at four university-affiliated hospitals were given a list of the patients on their service. For each patient, the provider was asked: "As of yesterday afternoon, did this patient have an indwelling urethral catheter?" Respondents' answers were compared with the results of examining the patient. RESULTS: Among 288 physicians and students on 56 medical teams, 256 (89%) completed the survey. Of 469 patients, 117 (25%) had an indwelling catheter. There were a total of 319 provider-patient observations among these 117 patients. Overall, providers were unaware of catheterization for 88 (28%) of the 319 provider-patient observations. Unawareness rates by level of training were 21% for students, 22% for interns, 27% for residents, and 38% for attending physicians (P = 0.06). Catheter use was inappropriate in 36 (31%) of the 117 patients with a catheter. Providers were unaware of catheter use for 44 (41%) of the 108 provider-patient observations of patients who were inappropriately catheterized. Catheterization was more likely to be appropriate if respondents were aware of the catheter (odds ratio = 3.7; 95% confidence interval, 2.1 to 6.7, P <0.001). CONCLUSION: Physicians are commonly unaware that their patients have an indwelling urinary catheter. Inappropriate catheters are more often "forgotten" than appropriate ones. System-wide interventions aimed at discontinuing unnecessary catheterization seem warranted.
Authors: Anne-Marie Leuck; James R Johnson; Matthew A Hunt; Kush Dhody; Kazem Kazempour; Patricia Ferrieri; Susan Kline Journal: Am J Infect Control Date: 2015-03-01 Impact factor: 2.918
Authors: Kartik Viswanathan; Tony Rosen; Mary R Mulcare; Sunday Clark; Jaime Hayes; Mark S Lachs; Neal E Flomenbaum Journal: J Emerg Nurs Date: 2015-04-11 Impact factor: 1.836
Authors: Molly L Paras; Erica S Shenoy; Heather E Hsu; Rochelle P Walensky; David C Hooper Journal: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol Date: 2015-08-17 Impact factor: 3.254
Authors: Martha Quinn; Jessica M Ameling; Jane Forman; Sarah L Krein; Milisa Manojlovich; Karen E Fowler; Elizabeth A King; Jennifer Meddings Journal: Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf Date: 2019-12-23
Authors: Sanjay Saint; Sarah L Krein; Milisa Manojlovich; Christine P Kowalski; Debbie Zawol; Kaveh G Shojania Journal: J Patient Saf Date: 2011-12 Impact factor: 2.844
Authors: Jay N Nathwani; Katherine E Law; Rebecca D Ray; Bridget R O'Connell Long; Rebekah M Fiers; Anne-Lise D D'Angelo; Shannon M DiMarco; Carla M Pugh Journal: J Surg Res Date: 2016-06-16 Impact factor: 2.192