Literature DB >> 11041466

Fibrin sheath stripping versus catheter exchange for the treatment of failed tunneled hemodialysis catheters: randomized clinical trial.

M Merport1, T P Murphy, T K Egglin, G J Dubel.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the effectiveness of two treatments for tunneled hemodialysis catheter malfunction: percutaneous fibrin sheath stripping (PFSS) and over-the-wire catheter exchange (EX).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Adult patients with poorly functioning tunneled hemodialysis catheters (flow rates < 200 mL/min) were randomly assigned to receive either PFSS or EX. Over the course of 20 months, 30 patients (37 encounters) referred to a single institution met the inclusion criteria and consented to participate. PFSS employed transcatheter snares via femoral vein puncture, whereas EX was performed over a guide wire with use of fluoroscopic guidance. Patients were followed up to determine the duration of continued adequate hemodialysis via manipulated catheters for up to 4 months (primary outcome measure).
RESULTS: Overall technical success rate was 97%. Mean catheter patency for the PFSS group was 24.5 +/- 29.3 days, and 52.2 +/- 43 days for the EX group (P < .0001). After EX, patency rates at 1, 2, 3, and 4 months were 71%, 33%, 27%, and 27%, compared to 31%, 16%, 7%, and 0% after PFSS (P = .04, logrank test). Exchanged catheters were significantly more likely to be patent for as long as 4 months (23% versus 0%; P < .05, chi2 test).
CONCLUSIONS: Malfunctioning tunneled hemodialysis catheters treated by means of EX are significantly more likely to remain patent for up to 4 months than are those treated by means of PFSS. According to the results of this trial, PFSS should not be performed as a routine therapy for catheter malfunction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11041466     DOI: 10.1016/s1051-0443(07)61351-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol        ISSN: 1051-0443            Impact factor:   3.464


  7 in total

1.  Fibrin sheath angioplasty: a technique to prevent superior vena cava stenosis secondary to dialysis catheters.

Authors:  Robert I Hacker; Lorena De Marco Garcia; Ankur Chawla; Thomas F Panetta
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2012-09

Review 2.  Management of dysfunctional catheters and tubes inserted by interventional radiology.

Authors:  Steven Y Huang; Bjorn I Engstrom; Matthew P Lungren; Charles Y Kim
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.513

3.  Patency and Complications of Translumbar Dialysis Catheters.

Authors:  Fanna Liu; Stacy Bennett; Susana Arrigain; Jesse Schold; Robert Heyka; Gordon McLennan; Sankar D Navaneethan
Journal:  Semin Dial       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 3.455

4.  Unconventional venous access techniques.

Authors:  Jonathan M Lorenz
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.513

5.  [Central venous catheters as access for acute and long-term dialysis].

Authors:  M Hollenbeck; A Niehuus; G Wozniak; S Hennigs
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 6.  Interventions for treating central venous haemodialysis catheter malfunction.

Authors:  Alice L Kennard; Giles D Walters; Simon H Jiang; Girish S Talaulikar
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-10-26

7.  Fibrin sheaths in central venous port catheters: treatment with low-dose, single injection of urokinase on an outpatient basis.

Authors:  De-Hua Chang; Kamal Mammadov; Tilman Hickethier; Jan Borggrefe; Martin Hellmich; David Maintz; Christoph Kabbasch
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 2.423

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.