Literature DB >> 11041008

The structure of attitudes: attribute importance, accessibility and judgment.

F van Harreveld1, J van der Pligt, N K de Vries, S Andreas.   

Abstract

Two studies related attribute importance to accessibility and speed of judgment. Attitudes were assessed by a direct attitude measure and a modal set of 15 attributes. Attributes were rated in terms of their probability and desirability. Subsequently, participants were required to select the five attributes they considered to be most important. Results of Study 1 (dealing with attitudes towards condom use) show that individually selected, important attributes are more easily retrieved and judged faster than non-selected, less important attributes. Judging attributes took less time than evaluating one's overall attitude, suggesting a bottom-up process in which the various attributes are combined to form an overall attitude. Study 2 (dealing with attitudes towards smoking) extends these findings and also addresses the stability of attitude structure. Important attributes were again associated with reduced response times, and attribute-related judgments took less time than judging one's overall attitude. Accessibility of important attributes remained stable over time as indicated by the results of a lexical decision task one week later. Finally, important attributes were also recalled better than less important attributes. Implications for research on attitude structure are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11041008     DOI: 10.1348/014466600164543

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0144-6665


  3 in total

1.  Violate my beliefs? Then you're to blame! Belief content as an explanation for causal attribution biases.

Authors:  Fredda Blanchard-Fields; Christopher Hertzog; Michelle Horhota
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2011-07-04

2.  Network Structure Explains the Impact of Attitudes on Voting Decisions.

Authors:  Jonas Dalege; Denny Borsboom; Frenk van Harreveld; Lourens J Waldorp; Han L J van der Maas
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-07       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Which outcome expectancies are important in determining young adults' intentions to use condoms with casual sexual partners?: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Katie V Newby; Katherine E Brown; David P French; Louise M Wallace
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 3.295

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.