Literature DB >> 11040477

Compliance with outpatient follow-up recommendations for infants at risk for retinopathy of prematurity.

A D Aprahamian1, D K Coats, E A Paysse, K Brady-Mccreery.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We undertook this study to determine how frequently at-risk infants were scheduled for and brought to follow-up appointments for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) examination after hospital discharge and to identify barriers to follow-up.
METHODS: The records of 126 infants with or at risk for ROP at the time of hospital discharge were retrospectively reviewed. Data recorded included the presence or absence of a timely outpatient follow-up appointment, the identity of the person who scheduled the appointment (hospital staff or parents), attendance rate for appointments made, race or ethnicity, and insurance status.
RESULTS: Sixty-two of 126 (49%) infants were scheduled for a timely outpatient examination. Sixty-four of 126 (51%) required telephone contact from our office to be scheduled for an appointment. Eight of 21 (38%) African American infants had an appointment scheduled without additional intervention by our office personnel, and 6 of 21 (29%) were brought to an appointment in a timely manner. Twenty-two of 33 (68%) white infants had an appointment scheduled without additional intervention by our office personnel, and 20 of 33 (61%) were brought to an appointment in a timely manner. African American patients were less likely than white patients to be brought to a follow-up appointment (P =.022). Eleven of 15 (73%) patients, whose appointments were scheduled by hospital personnel before discharge, were brought to their follow-up appointment, compared with 39 of 105 (37%) patients, whose parents were requested to schedule their own appointment (P =.008).
CONCLUSION: Almost 50% of infants with or at risk for ROP were not scheduled for a timely outpatient follow-up appointment, putting these neonates at risk for ROP-related blindness. Patients whose appointments were scheduled by hospital personnel before discharge were more likely to be brought to a follow-up examination. Extensive utilization of office support staff was required to ascertain the status of infants who did not have appointments scheduled or who were not brought to follow-up appointments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11040477     DOI: 10.1067/mpa.2000.106203

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J AAPOS        ISSN: 1091-8531            Impact factor:   1.220


  8 in total

1.  Neonatologists' practices and experiences in arranging retinopathy of prematurity screening services.

Authors:  Alex R Kemper; David K Wallace
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 7.124

2.  Malpractice and the quality of care in retinopathy of prematurity (an American Ophthalmological Society thesis).

Authors:  James D Reynolds
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2007

3.  Retinopathy of prematurity care: patterns of care and workforce analysis.

Authors:  Alex R Kemper; Sharon F Freedman; David K Wallace
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2008-04-25       Impact factor: 1.220

4.  Potential for a paradigm change in the detection of retinopathy of prematurity requiring treatment.

Authors:  Clare Gilbert; Richard Wormald; Alistair Fielder; Ashok Deorari; Luz Consuelo Zepeda-Romero; Graham Quinn; Anand Vinekar; Andrea Zin; Brian Darlow
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2015-07-24       Impact factor: 5.747

5.  Demographic profile and ocular characteristics of stage 5 retinopathy of prematurity at a referral center in Northwest China: implications for implementation.

Authors:  Guo-Rui Dou; Man-Hong Li; Zi-Feng Zhang; Yi-Na Lu; Yan-Ni Zhu; Hai-Yan Wang; Jing Wang; Xiao-Jie Wang; Jing Fan; Yu-Sheng Wang
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 2.209

6.  Retinopathy of prematurity in Rwanda: a prospective multi-centre study following introduction of screening and treatment services.

Authors:  Francis Mutangana; Charles Muhizi; Godelieve Mudereva; Piet Noë; Stephenson Musiime; Tharcisse Ngambe; Lisine Tuyisenge; Muzungu Kumwami; Hovaire Nsabimana; Craig Conard; Yannick Fonteyne; Ingele Casteels; Stefan De Smedt
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 3.775

7.  Pitfalls of Advanced Retinopathy of Prematurity Presentation: A Content Analysis of Medical Records.

Authors:  Lojain AlBathi; Noura Abouammoh; Nayef AlSwaina; Hani B AlBalawi; Abdullah A Al Qahtani; Mohammed Talea; Sulaiman M AlSulaiman; Marwan A Abouammoh
Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy       Date:  2021-09-16

Review 8.  Health Equity and Disparities in ROP Care: A Need for Systematic Evaluation.

Authors:  Tochukwu Ndukwe; Emily Cole; Angelica C Scanzera; Margaret A Chervinko; Michael F Chiang; John Peter Campbell; Robison Vernon Paul Chan
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 3.569

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.