Literature DB >> 11039655

Comparison of Actiwatch activity monitor and Children's Activity Rating Scale in children.

K J Finn1, B Specker.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The Children's Activity Rating Scale (CARS) is a rating scale that is used in direct observation of physical activity in children. Direct observation is costly and tedious, and accuracy may decrease as the observation period lengthens. Recently, motion sensors have gained acceptance for assessment of physical activity. The purpose of this study was to compare 6 h of activity levels using simultaneous monitoring of preschool aged children with CARS and the Actiwatch (Mini-mitter Company Inc.) activity monitor.
METHODS: A total of 40 children had 5-6 h (mean of 5.9 h) of direct observation while wearing a monitor on the waist. Simultaneous 3-min mean CARS scores and 3-min activity counts were matched for each subject.
RESULTS: The range for the mean 3-min CARS scores ranged from 1.00 to 4.50. The 3-min activity counts ranged from 0 to 9,695 with a mean of 670 (median 243). The within child correlations between the 3-min CARS score and the 3-min sensor readings ranged from 0.03 to 0.92 (median of 0.74). We found the correlation coefficients were higher in those children who were more active, probably due to the larger ranges in the CARS scores. When using mixed model repeated measures, sensor readings were significantly associated with CARS (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that the 3-min CARS score correlates with 3-min activity counts, favoring the use of the activity monitors in assessing physical activity in preschool-aged children.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11039655     DOI: 10.1097/00005768-200010000-00021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc        ISSN: 0195-9131            Impact factor:   5.411


  18 in total

1.  Sources of continuity and change in activity level in early childhood.

Authors:  Kimberly J Saudino
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2011-11-22

2.  Measuring physical activity in preschoolers: Reliability and validity of The System for Observing Fitness Instruction Time for Preschoolers (SOFIT-P).

Authors:  Shreela Sharma; Ru-Jye Chuang; Katherine Skala; Heather Atteberry
Journal:  Meas Phys Educ Exerc Sci       Date:  2011

3.  Prediction of energy expenditure and physical activity in preschoolers.

Authors:  Nancy F Butte; William W Wong; Jong Soo Lee; Anne L Adolph; Maurice R Puyau; Issa F Zakeri
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 5.411

Review 4.  Physical activity in preschoolers: understanding prevalence and measurement issues.

Authors:  Melody Oliver; Grant M Schofield; Gregory S Kolt
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 11.136

5.  Physical activity and asthma symptoms among New York City Head Start Children.

Authors:  Andrew Rundle; Inge F Goldstein; Robert B Mellins; Maxine Ashby-Thompson; Lori Hoepner; Judith S Jacobson
Journal:  J Asthma       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.515

6.  Walking age does not explain term versus preterm difference in bone geometry.

Authors:  Haifa Abou Samra; Bonny Specker
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 4.406

7.  What is in a name? Comparing diagnostic criteria for chronic fatigue syndrome with or without fibromyalgia.

Authors:  Mira Meeus; Kelly Ickmans; Filip Struyf; Daphne Kos; Luc Lambrecht; Barbara Willekens; Patrick Cras; Jo Nijs
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 2.980

8.  Assessing children's physical activity in their homes: the observational system for recording physical activity in children-home.

Authors:  Kerry L McIver; William H Brown; Karin A Pfeiffer; Marsha Dowda; Russell R Pate
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2009

9.  Cross-sectional time series and multivariate adaptive regression splines models using accelerometry and heart rate predict energy expenditure of preschoolers.

Authors:  Issa F Zakeri; Anne L Adolph; Maurice R Puyau; Firoz A Vohra; Nancy F Butte
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 4.798

10.  Translation equations to compare ActiGraph GT3X and Actical accelerometers activity counts.

Authors:  Leon Straker; Amity Campbell
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2012-04-20       Impact factor: 4.615

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.