PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the primary factors causing the differential oxygen uptake (VO2) response at submaximal intensities between one-legged and two-legged exercise, and whether peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak) increases in proportion to the increase in active muscle mass. METHODS: Two different types of exercise were used for this experiment, each requiring a different movement, a different method of stabilizing posture, and, finally, a different limiting VO2peak. In experiment 1, nine male subjects performed one-legged cycling (OLC) and two-legged cycling exercise (TLC) at a pedaling rate of 80 rpm. The exercise intensity was first set at 80 W and was increased by 40 W every 3 min until exhaustion. In experiment 2, six healthy male subjects performed one-legged knee-extension (OKE) and two-legged knee-extension (TKE) exercise at a rate of 50 contractions per minute. The knee-extension exercise was done at constant work rates for a 3-min session in OKE or a 4-min session in TKE. The exercise bouts were performed intermittently at four to seven different submaximal intensities and VO2 was determined at each intensity in all exercises. RESULTS: At submaximal intensities, VO2 in relation to work rate of one-legged exercise was more steep than those of two-legged exercise, and the mean values of VO2 were significantly higher in one-legged exercise than those in two-legged exercise in both knee extension and cycling exercise. Mean values of VO2peak for two-legged exercise were significantly higher than that for one-legged exercise (P < 0.01); however, it was much lower than two times of that for one-legged exercise even in knee extension exercise where the VO2peak would be limited peripherally. CONCLUSION: The findings of this study suggest that the differential VO2 response between one-legged and two-legged exercise would be attributed not only to the difference in force application throughout the exercise movement and to the effect of a postural component but also to the inhibited circulatory response caused by the multiple limb exercise. In addition, it was supposed that VO2peak does not increase in proportion to the exercising muscle mass even during smaller muscle activity where the cardiac pumping capacity has not reached its upper limit.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the primary factors causing the differential oxygen uptake (VO2) response at submaximal intensities between one-legged and two-legged exercise, and whether peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak) increases in proportion to the increase in active muscle mass. METHODS: Two different types of exercise were used for this experiment, each requiring a different movement, a different method of stabilizing posture, and, finally, a different limiting VO2peak. In experiment 1, nine male subjects performed one-legged cycling (OLC) and two-legged cycling exercise (TLC) at a pedaling rate of 80 rpm. The exercise intensity was first set at 80 W and was increased by 40 W every 3 min until exhaustion. In experiment 2, six healthy male subjects performed one-legged knee-extension (OKE) and two-legged knee-extension (TKE) exercise at a rate of 50 contractions per minute. The knee-extension exercise was done at constant work rates for a 3-min session in OKE or a 4-min session in TKE. The exercise bouts were performed intermittently at four to seven different submaximal intensities and VO2 was determined at each intensity in all exercises. RESULTS: At submaximal intensities, VO2 in relation to work rate of one-legged exercise was more steep than those of two-legged exercise, and the mean values of VO2 were significantly higher in one-legged exercise than those in two-legged exercise in both knee extension and cycling exercise. Mean values of VO2peak for two-legged exercise were significantly higher than that for one-legged exercise (P < 0.01); however, it was much lower than two times of that for one-legged exercise even in knee extension exercise where the VO2peak would be limited peripherally. CONCLUSION: The findings of this study suggest that the differential VO2 response between one-legged and two-legged exercise would be attributed not only to the difference in force application throughout the exercise movement and to the effect of a postural component but also to the inhibited circulatory response caused by the multiple limb exercise. In addition, it was supposed that VO2peak does not increase in proportion to the exercising muscle mass even during smaller muscle activity where the cardiac pumping capacity has not reached its upper limit.