PURPOSE: Monitoring physical performance is of major importance in competitive sports. Indices commonly used, like resting heart rate, VO2max, and hormones, cannot be easily used because of difficulties in routine use, of variations too small to be reliable, or of technical challenges in acquiring the data. METHODS: We chose to assess autonomic nervous system activity using heart rate variability in seven middle-distance runners, aged 24.6 +/- 4.8 yr, during their usual training cycle composed of 3 wk of heavy training periods, followed by a relative resting week. The electrocardiogram was recorded overnight twice a week and temporal and frequency indices of heart rate variability, using Fourier and Wavelet transforms, were calculated. Daily training loads and fatigue sensations were estimated with a questionnaire. Similar recordings were performed in a sedentary control group. RESULTS: The results demonstrated a significant and progressive decrease in parasympathetic indices of up to -41% (P < 0.05) during the 3 wk of heavy training, followed by a significant increase during the relative resting week of up to +46% (P < 0.05). The indices of sympathetic activity followed the opposite trend, first up to +31% and then -24% (P < 0.05), respectively. The percentage increasing mean nocturnal heart rate variation remained below 12% (P < 0.05). There was no significant variation in the control group. CONCLUSION: This study confirmed that heavy training shifted the cardiac autonomic balance toward a predominance of the sympathetic over the parasympathetic drive. When recorded during the night, heart rate variability appeared to be a better tool than resting heart rate to evaluate cumulated physical fatigue, as it magnified the induced changes in autonomic nervous system activity. These results could be of interest for optimizing individual training profiles.
PURPOSE: Monitoring physical performance is of major importance in competitive sports. Indices commonly used, like resting heart rate, VO2max, and hormones, cannot be easily used because of difficulties in routine use, of variations too small to be reliable, or of technical challenges in acquiring the data. METHODS: We chose to assess autonomic nervous system activity using heart rate variability in seven middle-distance runners, aged 24.6 +/- 4.8 yr, during their usual training cycle composed of 3 wk of heavy training periods, followed by a relative resting week. The electrocardiogram was recorded overnight twice a week and temporal and frequency indices of heart rate variability, using Fourier and Wavelet transforms, were calculated. Daily training loads and fatigue sensations were estimated with a questionnaire. Similar recordings were performed in a sedentary control group. RESULTS: The results demonstrated a significant and progressive decrease in parasympathetic indices of up to -41% (P < 0.05) during the 3 wk of heavy training, followed by a significant increase during the relative resting week of up to +46% (P < 0.05). The indices of sympathetic activity followed the opposite trend, first up to +31% and then -24% (P < 0.05), respectively. The percentage increasing mean nocturnal heart rate variation remained below 12% (P < 0.05). There was no significant variation in the control group. CONCLUSION: This study confirmed that heavy training shifted the cardiac autonomic balance toward a predominance of the sympathetic over the parasympathetic drive. When recorded during the night, heart rate variability appeared to be a better tool than resting heart rate to evaluate cumulated physical fatigue, as it magnified the induced changes in autonomic nervous system activity. These results could be of interest for optimizing individual training profiles.
Authors: Olga Dergacheva; Kathleen J Griffioen; Robert A Neff; David Mendelowitz Journal: Respir Physiol Neurobiol Date: 2010-05-07 Impact factor: 1.931
Authors: Daniel Alexandre Boullosa; Laurinda Abreu; José Luis Tuimil; Anthony Scott Leicht Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2011-10-14 Impact factor: 3.078
Authors: Esa Hynynen; Niilo Konttinen; Ulla Kinnunen; Heikki Kyröläinen; Heikki Rusko Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2010-10-24 Impact factor: 3.078
Authors: Philippe Hellard; Fanny Guimaraes; Marta Avalos; Nicolas Houel; Christophe Hausswirth; Jean François Toussaint Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2011-06 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Clint R Bellenger; Joel T Fuller; Rebecca L Thomson; Kade Davison; Eileen Y Robertson; Jonathan D Buckley Journal: Sports Med Date: 2016-10 Impact factor: 11.136
Authors: Vincent Pichot; Frédéric Roche; Christian Denis; Martin Garet; David Duverney; Frédéric Costes; Jean-Claude Barthélémy Journal: Clin Auton Res Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 4.435