INTRODUCTION: The hyperphosphatemia, hypocalcemia and low calcitriol levels are pathogenic factors for secondary hyperparathyroidism in chronic renal failure. The phosphorus control is essential to prevent secondary hyperparathyroidism. There are not comparatives studies to test the efficacy of control of phosphorus binders in predialysis patients. AIM: To compare the efficacy of calcium carbonate vs calcium acetate as phosphate binder in predialysis patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The present study includes 28 patients with chronic renal failure (mean clearance of creatinine 21 ml/min). Patients were separated into two groups: Group 1: (n = 14) received calcium carbonate 2,500 mg/day (1,000 mg of calcium); Group 2: (n = 14) receives calcium acetate 1,000 mg (254 mg of calcium). Calcium and phosphorus were determined every 4 months; i-PTH, alkaline phosphatase and clearance of creatinine were determined every six months. RESULTS: Both groups were comparable regarding age, renal function, calcium, phosphorus, alkaline phosphatase and i-PTH on basal situation and the end of study were not different. The serum calcium increased, not significantly, in the calcium carbonate group (group 1) [from 9.2 to 9.8 mg/dl (p = 0.05)], however it was not modified in the calcium acetate group (group 2). The serum phosphorus decreased significantly (p < 0.05) in both groups, independently of the calcium levels. Alkaline phosphatase and i-PTH not was modified during the study period. CONCLUSIONS: 1) Both calcium carbonate and calcium acetate are similarly effective as phosphate binder. 2) The carbonate group required four fold greater doses of calcium that acetate group. 3) The calcium acetate has less hypercalcemic effect than calcium carbonate.
RCT Entities:
INTRODUCTION: The hyperphosphatemia, hypocalcemia and low calcitriol levels are pathogenic factors for secondary hyperparathyroidism in chronic renal failure. The phosphorus control is essential to prevent secondary hyperparathyroidism. There are not comparatives studies to test the efficacy of control of phosphorus binders in predialysis patients. AIM: To compare the efficacy of calcium carbonate vs calcium acetate as phosphate binder in predialysis patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The present study includes 28 patients with chronic renal failure (mean clearance of creatinine 21 ml/min). Patients were separated into two groups: Group 1: (n = 14) received calcium carbonate 2,500 mg/day (1,000 mg of calcium); Group 2: (n = 14) receives calcium acetate 1,000 mg (254 mg of calcium). Calcium and phosphorus were determined every 4 months; i-PTH, alkaline phosphatase and clearance of creatinine were determined every six months. RESULTS: Both groups were comparable regarding age, renal function, calcium, phosphorus, alkaline phosphatase and i-PTH on basal situation and the end of study were not different. The serum calcium increased, not significantly, in the calcium carbonate group (group 1) [from 9.2 to 9.8 mg/dl (p = 0.05)], however it was not modified in the calcium acetate group (group 2). The serum phosphorus decreased significantly (p < 0.05) in both groups, independently of the calcium levels. Alkaline phosphatase and i-PTH not was modified during the study period. CONCLUSIONS: 1) Both calcium carbonate and calcium acetate are similarly effective as phosphate binder. 2) The carbonate group required four fold greater doses of calcium that acetate group. 3) The calcium acetate has less hypercalcemic effect than calcium carbonate.
Authors: Charles J Diskin; Thomas J Stokes; Linda M Dansby; Lautrec Radcliff; Thomas B Carter Journal: Int Urol Nephrol Date: 2007-01-10 Impact factor: 2.370
Authors: Wajeh Qunibi; Wolfgang C Winkelmayer; Richard Solomon; Moustafa Moustafa; Paul Kessler; Chiang-Hong Ho; Jonathan Greenberg; Jose A Diaz-Buxo Journal: BMC Nephrol Date: 2011-02-16 Impact factor: 2.388
Authors: Blanca Gros; Antonio Galán; Emilio González-Parra; Jose A Herrero; Maria Echave; Stefan Vegter; Keith Tolley; Itziar Oyagüez Journal: Health Econ Rev Date: 2015-06-11