Literature DB >> 11039154

Socioeconomic differences in self-assessed health in a chronically ill population: the role of different health aspects.

J G Simon1, H van de Mheen, J B van der Meer, J P Mackenbach.   

Abstract

We investigated the role that different health aspects play in the explanation of socioeconomic differences in self-assessed health. Socioeconomic differences in self-assessed health were investigated in relation to chronic disease, functional limitations, psychosomatic symptoms, and perceived discomfort/distress. In multiple logistic regression analyses, for three cutoff points of self-assessed health, significant socioeconomic differences in self-assessed health could be observed after adjusting for age and gender. After separate adjustment for each of the four health aspects, the analyses showed that for a health assessment as less-than-good and less-than-fair, psychosomatic symptoms were the most powerful explanatory factor. Perceived discomfort/distress proved to be the most powerful factor for a poor health assessment. We found that socioeconomic differences in self-assessed health could, to a large extent (72-80%), be explained through socioeconomic differences in the prevalence of the four types of health problems included in the study. For all cutoff points, objective health aspects accounted for a relatively small part of the socioeconomic variability in self-assessed health. More subjective aspects of health accounted for more of the variability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11039154     DOI: 10.1023/a:1005552814010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Behav Med        ISSN: 0160-7715


  38 in total

1.  Development of a health conception scale.

Authors:  S C Laffrey
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 2.228

2.  Self-assessment of health: a longitudinal study of elderly subjects.

Authors:  G L Maddox; E B Douglass
Journal:  J Health Soc Behav       Date:  1973-03

3.  The determinants of excellent health: different from the determinants of ill-health?

Authors:  J P Mackenbach; J van den Bos; I M Joung; H van de Mheen; K Stronks
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 7.196

4.  Energy as a central factor in the self-assessment of health.

Authors:  J K Dixon; J P Dixon; M Hickey
Journal:  ANS Adv Nurs Sci       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 1.824

5.  Predicting changes in perceived health status.

Authors:  M S Goldstein; J M Siegel; R Boyer
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Psychological distress and perceived health status.

Authors:  R Tessler; D Mechanic
Journal:  J Health Soc Behav       Date:  1978-09

7.  Another look at self-rated health among the elderly.

Authors:  T Tissue
Journal:  J Gerontol       Date:  1972-01

8.  Factors influencing self-assessment of health.

Authors:  T F Garrity; G W Somes; M B Marx
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 4.634

9.  Relation of perceived health with psychosocial variables in elderly osteoarthritis patients.

Authors:  B R De Forge; J Sobal; J P Krick
Journal:  Psychol Rep       Date:  1989-02

10.  Determinants of change in perceived health in a longitudinal study of older adults.

Authors:  J Rodin; G McAvay
Journal:  J Gerontol       Date:  1992-11
View more
  3 in total

1.  Socioeconomic position and self-rated health: the contribution of childhood socioeconomic circumstances, adult socioeconomic status, and material resources.

Authors:  Mikko Laaksonen; Ossi Rahkonen; Pekka Martikainen; Eero Lahelma
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2005-07-07       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Assessing socioeconomic health care utilization inequity in Israel: impact of alternative approaches to morbidity adjustment.

Authors:  Efrat Shadmi; Ran D Balicer; Karen Kinder; Chad Abrams; Jonathan P Weiner
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2011-08-01       Impact factor: 3.295

3.  To what extent do socioeconomic inequalities in SRH reflect inequalities in burden of disease? The HELIUS study.

Authors:  Henrike Galenkamp; Hans van Oers; Karien Stronks
Journal:  J Public Health (Oxf)       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 2.341

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.