Literature DB >> 11038523

Binocular vision in insects: How mantids solve the correspondence problem.

S Rossel1.   

Abstract

Praying mantids use binocular cues to judge whether their prey is in striking distance. When there are several moving targets within their binocular visual field, mantids need to solve the correspondence problem. They must select between the possible pairings of retinal images in the two eyes so that they can strike at a single real target. In this study, mantids were presented with two targets in various configurations, and the resulting fixating saccades that precede the strike were analyzed. The distributions of saccades show that mantids consistently prefer one out of several possible matches. Selection is in part guided by the position and the spatiotemporal features of the target image in each eye. Selection also depends upon the binocular disparity of the images, suggesting that insects can perform local binocular computations. The pairing rules ensure that mantids tend to aim at real targets and not at "ghost" targets arising from false matches.

Entities:  

Year:  1996        PMID: 11038523      PMCID: PMC24075          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.93.23.13229

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  1 in total

1.  Vertical disparity and binocular vision in the praying mantis.

Authors:  S Rossel; U Mathis; T Collett
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 3.241

  1 in total
  9 in total

Review 1.  Attention-like processes in insects.

Authors:  Vivek Nityananda
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Second-order cues to figure motion enable object detection during prey capture by praying mantises.

Authors:  Vivek Nityananda; James O'Keeffe; Diana Umeton; Adam Simmons; Jenny C A Read
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-12-09       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Behavioural and neural responses of crabs show evidence for selective attention in predator avoidance.

Authors:  Zahra M Bagheri; Callum G Donohue; Julian C Partridge; Jan M Hemmi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  A computational model of stereoscopic prey capture in praying mantises.

Authors:  James O'Keeffe; Sin Hui Yap; Ichasus Llamas-Cornejo; Vivek Nityananda; Jenny C A Read
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 4.779

5.  Intrinsic activity in the fly brain gates visual information during behavioral choices.

Authors:  Shiming Tang; Mikko Juusola
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-12-30       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  The Killer Fly Hunger Games: Target Size and Speed Predict Decision to Pursuit.

Authors:  Trevor J Wardill; Katie Knowles; Laura Barlow; Gervasio Tapia; Karin Nordström; Robert M Olberg; Paloma T Gonzalez-Bellido
Journal:  Brain Behav Evol       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 1.808

7.  A Novel Interception Strategy in a Miniature Robber Fly with Extreme Visual Acuity.

Authors:  Trevor J Wardill; Samuel T Fabian; Ann C Pettigrew; Doekele G Stavenga; Karin Nordström; Paloma T Gonzalez-Bellido
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 10.834

8.  Insect stereopsis demonstrated using a 3D insect cinema.

Authors:  Vivek Nityananda; Ghaith Tarawneh; Ronny Rosner; Judith Nicolas; Stuart Crichton; Jenny Read
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 9.  Stereopsis in animals: evolution, function and mechanisms.

Authors:  Vivek Nityananda; Jenny C A Read
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2017-07-15       Impact factor: 3.312

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.