Literature DB >> 11038446

Parents' responses to disclosure of genetic test results of their children.

F J Grosfeld1, F A Beemer, C J Lips, K S Hendriks, H F ten Kroode.   

Abstract

The psychological reactions of 22 parental couples and 3 single parents were investigated after disclosure of genetic test results of their children. The children were tested for the early-onset, monogenetic cancer disorder multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2. Participants came from 13 different families and were aged between 28 and 47 years. Parents who were informed that their child was a gene carrier reacted with resignation, showed moderate to high levels of test-related and general anxiety, but few psychological complaints. Daily activities were disturbed in 43% of the parents with carrier-children. There was little disruption of the parents' future perspective, apart from some socioeconomic disadvantages and increased parental concern for the carrier-children. Most parents with carrier-children showed restraint with respect to short-term prophylactic treatment. Parents with favorable test results showed significantly less anxiety and no disturbance in their daily activities. They did not, however, seem to be reassured by the DNA test result. These parents questioned the reliability of the DNA test, wanted confirmation of the test results, and were eager to continue screening of their noncarrier children. Parents, especially those with a lower level of education and/or a pessimistic view of the future, were distressed by unfavorable test results. Additional counseling is advised to prevent parents of carrier-children worrying unnecessarily, or parents with children in whom the disease gene was not found being not reassured. Am. J. Med. Genet. 94:316-323, 2000. Copyright 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11038446     DOI: 10.1002/1096-8628(20001002)94:4<316::aid-ajmg10>3.0.co;2-n

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Genet        ISSN: 0148-7299


  10 in total

Review 1.  Methodology in longitudinal studies on psychological effects of predictive DNA testing: a review.

Authors:  R Timman; T Stijnen; A Tibben
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 6.318

Review 2.  Research issues in genetic testing of adolescents for obesity.

Authors:  Mary E Segal; Pamela Sankar; Danielle R Reed
Journal:  Nutr Rev       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 7.110

3.  Genetic testing in asymptomatic minors: background considerations towards ESHG Recommendations.

Authors:  Pascal Borry; Gerry Evers-Kiebooms; Martina C Cornel; Angus Clarke; Kris Dierickx
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 4.  Management of medullary thyroid carcinoma and MEN2 syndromes in childhood.

Authors:  Steven G Waguespack; Thereasa A Rich; Nancy D Perrier; Camilo Jimenez; Gilbert J Cote
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2011-08-23       Impact factor: 43.330

5.  Parental Perception of Self-Empowerment in Pediatric Pharmacogenetic Testing: The Reactions of Parents to the Communication of Actual and Hypothetical CYP2D6 Test Results.

Authors:  Sarah Adelsperger; Cynthia A Prows; Melanie F Myers; Cassandra L Perry; Ariel Chandler; Ingrid A Holm; John A Lynch
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2016-08-30

6.  Genetic testing of children for familial cancers: a comparative legal perspective on consent, communication of information and confidentiality.

Authors:  Roy Gilbar
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2009-07-17       Impact factor: 2.375

7.  Impact on parents of HLA-DQ2/DQ8 genotyping in healthy children from coeliac families.

Authors:  Margreet M S Wessels; Sabine L Vriezinga; Sybille Koletzko; Katharina Werkstetter; Gemma Castillejo-De Villasante; Raanan Shamir; Corina Hartman; Hein Putter; Sylvia M van der Pal; Cisca Wijmenga; Enzo Bravi; M Luisa Mearin
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 4.246

8.  Pediatric ethics guidelines for hereditary medullary thyroid cancer.

Authors:  M Sara Rosenthal; Douglas S Diekema
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Endocrinol       Date:  2011-03-07

9.  Health status in patients at risk of inherited arrhythmias and sudden unexpected death compared to the general population.

Authors:  Anniken Hamang; Geir Egil Eide; Karin Nordin; Berit Rokne; Cathrine Bjorvatn; Nina Øyen
Journal:  BMC Med Genet       Date:  2010-02-17       Impact factor: 2.103

10.  Parent-Child Communication and Reproductive Considerations in Families with Genetic Cancer Predisposition Syndromes: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Taylor M Dattilo; Keagan G Lipak; Olivia E Clark; Alison Gehred; Amani Sampson; Gwendolyn Quinn; Kristin Zajo; Megan E Sutter; Meghan Bowman-Curci; Molly Gardner; Cynthia A Gerhardt; Leena Nahata
Journal:  J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol       Date:  2020-09-08       Impact factor: 2.223

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.