Literature DB >> 11038078

Abdominal perfusion pressure: a superior parameter in the assessment of intra-abdominal hypertension.

M L Cheatham1, M W White, S G Sagraves, J L Johnson, E F Block.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical utility of abdominal perfusion pressure (mean arterial pressure minus intra-abdominal pressure) as both a resuscitative endpoint and predictor of survival in patients with intra-abdominal hypertension.
METHODS: 144 surgical patients treated for intra-abdominal hypertension between May 1997 and June 1999 were retrospectively reviewed. Multivariate logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of common physiologic variables and resuscitation endpoints were performed to determine the decision thresholds for each variable that predict patient survival.
RESULTS: Abdominal perfusion pressure was statistically superior to both mean arterial pressure and intravesicular pressure in predicting patient survival from intra-abdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome. Multiple regression analysis demonstrated that abdominal perfusion pressure was also superior to other common resuscitation endpoints, including arterial pH, base deficit, arterial lactate, and hourly urinary output.
CONCLUSION: Abdominal perfusion pressure appears to be a clinically useful resuscitation endpoint and predictor of patient survival during treatment for intra-abdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11038078     DOI: 10.1097/00005373-200010000-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Trauma        ISSN: 0022-5282


  66 in total

1.  Intra-abdominal pressure: time for clinical practice guidelines?

Authors:  Michael Sugrue
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2002-03-20       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Intravesicular pressure monitoring does not cause urinary tract infection.

Authors:  Michael L Cheatham; Scott G Sagraves; Jeffery L Johnson; Mark W White
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2006-08-29       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 3.  [Abdominal compartment syndrome: significance, diagnosis and treatment].

Authors:  A Schachtrupp; M Jansen; P Bertram; R Kuhlen; V Schumpelick
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.041

4.  Clinical examination is an inaccurate predictor of intraabdominal pressure.

Authors:  Michael Sugrue; Adrian Bauman; Felicity Jones; Gillian Bishop; Arthas Flabouris; Michael Parr; Anthony Stewart; Ken Hillman; Stephen A Deane
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2002-09-26       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Delayed celiotomy or laparoscopy as part of the nonoperative management of blunt hepatic trauma.

Authors:  Christian Letoublon; Yao Chen; Catherine Arvieux; David Voirin; Irene Morra; Christophe Broux; Olivier Risse
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Validation of the urine column measurement as an estimation of the intra-abdominal pressure.

Authors:  Herjan van der Steeg; Jesse P van Akkeren; Saskia Houterman; Rudi M H Roumen
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2009-01-06       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 7.  [Abdominal compartment syndrome].

Authors:  J Reibetanz; C-T Germer
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 0.840

8.  Elevated intra-abdominal pressure is a "second-hit".

Authors:  Adhish Basu
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Intra-abdominal pressure and abdominal perfusion pressure: which is a better marker of severity in patients with severe acute pancreatitis.

Authors:  Lu Ke; Hai-bin Ni; Zhi-hui Tong; Wei-qin Li; Ning Li; Jie-shou Li
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-05-10       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 10.  Current insights in intra-abdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome: open the abdomen and keep it open!

Authors:  Inneke E De Laet; Mariska Ravyts; Wesley Vidts; Jody Valk; Jan J De Waele; Manu L N G Malbrain
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2008-06-17       Impact factor: 3.445

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.