D J Kerr1, R Gray, C McConkey, J Barnwell. 1. CRC Institute for Cancer Studies, The Medical School, The University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK. QUASAR@bham.ac.uk
Abstract
BACKGROUND:QUASAR is a large trial of adjuvant chemotherapy for colorectal cancer in which clinicians could choose to deliver a standard adjuvant cytotoxic chemotherapy regimen, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and L-folinic acid (L-FA), in either a once-weekly or a four-weekly schedule. We report results of a non-randomised comparison between these schedules with respect to survival, recurrence and differential toxicity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a factorial (2 x 2) trial design, QUASAR compared high-dose (175 mg) versus low-dose (25 mg) L-FA and levamisole versus placebo. The dose of 5-FU was fixed at 370 mg/m2 and although the recommended schedule was i.v. bolus delivery, daily for 5 days repeated four-weekly for 6 months, a significant proportion of randomising clinicians were constrained to deliver once-weekly 5-FU-L-FA for 30 weeks. RESULTS:Four thousand nine hundred twenty-seven patients were entered into QUASAR between May 1994 and October 1997, eighteen hundred twenty-nine of whom have recurred and sixteen hundred eighty-nine died. Similar numbers 2370 vs. 2559 were treated with the once-weekly and four-weekly schedules and the demographic features of the 2 groups were well balanced: stage C, 73.3% once-weekly vs. 71.0% four-weekly; colon, 68.0% vs. 68.3%; high-dose FA, 50.1% vs. 49.9%; levamisole, 49.3% vs. 49.3%; females, 40.2% vs. 41.7%; median age (years) 62 vs. 61. The risk of recurrence and survival were similar regardless of schedule: three-year survival was 70.6% once-weekly vs. 71.0% four-weekly; three-year recurrence risk was 35.6% once-weekly vs. 35.5% four-weekly; But, the once-weekly regimen was much less toxic: number of patients for whom toxicity was reported (once-weekly: four-weekly), stomatitis, 37 vs. 337; diarrhoea, 260 vs. 440; neutropenia, 20 vs. 153. CONCLUSIONS: The once-weekly regimen is much less toxic than and, apparently, about as effective as the four-weekly schedule. This suggests that the toxicity of 5-FU-L-FA adjuvant chemotherapy could be reduced substantially by weekly scheduling without compromising efficacy. Alternatively, efficacy might be enhanced with equal toxicity by more dose-intense weekly FU-L-FA regimens. However, this conclusion from a non-randomised comparison needs confirmation in prospective randomised studies.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: QUASAR is a large trial of adjuvant chemotherapy for colorectal cancer in which clinicians could choose to deliver a standard adjuvant cytotoxic chemotherapy regimen, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and L-folinic acid (L-FA), in either a once-weekly or a four-weekly schedule. We report results of a non-randomised comparison between these schedules with respect to survival, recurrence and differential toxicity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a factorial (2 x 2) trial design, QUASAR compared high-dose (175 mg) versus low-dose (25 mg) L-FA and levamisole versus placebo. The dose of 5-FU was fixed at 370 mg/m2 and although the recommended schedule was i.v. bolus delivery, daily for 5 days repeated four-weekly for 6 months, a significant proportion of randomising clinicians were constrained to deliver once-weekly 5-FU-L-FA for 30 weeks. RESULTS: Four thousand nine hundred twenty-seven patients were entered into QUASAR between May 1994 and October 1997, eighteen hundred twenty-nine of whom have recurred and sixteen hundred eighty-nine died. Similar numbers 2370 vs. 2559 were treated with the once-weekly and four-weekly schedules and the demographic features of the 2 groups were well balanced: stage C, 73.3% once-weekly vs. 71.0% four-weekly; colon, 68.0% vs. 68.3%; high-dose FA, 50.1% vs. 49.9%; levamisole, 49.3% vs. 49.3%; females, 40.2% vs. 41.7%; median age (years) 62 vs. 61. The risk of recurrence and survival were similar regardless of schedule: three-year survival was 70.6% once-weekly vs. 71.0% four-weekly; three-year recurrence risk was 35.6% once-weekly vs. 35.5% four-weekly; But, the once-weekly regimen was much less toxic: number of patients for whom toxicity was reported (once-weekly: four-weekly), stomatitis, 37 vs. 337; diarrhoea, 260 vs. 440; neutropenia, 20 vs. 153. CONCLUSIONS: The once-weekly regimen is much less toxic than and, apparently, about as effective as the four-weekly schedule. This suggests that the toxicity of 5-FU-L-FA adjuvant chemotherapy could be reduced substantially by weekly scheduling without compromising efficacy. Alternatively, efficacy might be enhanced with equal toxicity by more dose-intense weekly FU-L-FA regimens. However, this conclusion from a non-randomised comparison needs confirmation in prospective randomised studies.
Authors: David S Williams; Dmitri Mouradov; Clare Browne; Michelle Palmieri; Meg J Elliott; Rebecca Nightingale; Catherine G Fang; Rita Li; John M Mariadason; Ian Faragher; Ian T Jones; Leonid Churilov; Niall C Tebbutt; Peter Gibbs; Oliver M Sieber Journal: Mod Pathol Date: 2019-08-30 Impact factor: 7.842
Authors: S P Ackland; M Jones; D Tu; J Simes; J Yuen; A-M Sargeant; H Dhillon; R M Goldberg; E Abdi; L Shepherd; M J Moore Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2005-11-28 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: A Sobrero; G Frassineti; A Falcone; L Dogliotti; R Rosso; F Di Costanzo; F D Costanzo; P Bruzzi Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2005-01-17 Impact factor: 7.640