B Friström1, B L Lundh. 1. Department of Ophthalmology, University of Linköping, Sweden.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To study the influence of cataract on peripheral and central colour contrast sensitivity. METHODS: Peripheral and central colour contrast sensitivity was measured with a computer graphics system along the protan, deutan and tritan axes. Included were 30 patients with cataract divided into three sub-groups: cortical cataract, nuclear sclerosis and posterior subcapsular cataract. Colour contrast was measured before and after cataract operation. RESULTS: There were significant differences in peripheral colour contrast thresholds comparing the preoperative and postoperative results. This difference existed even in patients (n=19) with a pre-operative visual acuity > or = 0.5 (mean 0.6). The tritan axis was the one most affected by cataract. There was no significant difference between cataract sub-groups. Also, the central colour contrast sensitivity was affected by cataract. Again, the tritan axis was the most affected one. There was no significant difference between the cataract sub-groups. We also found large and significant differences in central colour contrast thresholds between normal subjects and postoperative values from the cataract group in all colour axes. The colour contrast sensitivity was poorer in pseudophakes than in normals. There was a difference between the three groups of different IOL material used (PMMA, acrylic and silicone). The difference was significant in the protan axis, the acrylic group having the best colour contrast sensitivity. CONCLUSION: Peripheral colour contrast sensitivity was affected by cataract, even when only moderately developed. This finding is of importance and should be considered when the method is used to study other eye diseases e.g. glaucoma. Central colour contrast sensitivity was also affected by cataract. The pseudophakes were found to have poorer colour contrast sensitivity than normals. The material in the IOL seemed to be of importance for colour contrast.
PURPOSE: To study the influence of cataract on peripheral and central colour contrast sensitivity. METHODS: Peripheral and central colour contrast sensitivity was measured with a computer graphics system along the protan, deutan and tritan axes. Included were 30 patients with cataract divided into three sub-groups: cortical cataract, nuclear sclerosis and posterior subcapsular cataract. Colour contrast was measured before and after cataract operation. RESULTS: There were significant differences in peripheral colour contrast thresholds comparing the preoperative and postoperative results. This difference existed even in patients (n=19) with a pre-operative visual acuity > or = 0.5 (mean 0.6). The tritan axis was the one most affected by cataract. There was no significant difference between cataract sub-groups. Also, the central colour contrast sensitivity was affected by cataract. Again, the tritan axis was the most affected one. There was no significant difference between the cataract sub-groups. We also found large and significant differences in central colour contrast thresholds between normal subjects and postoperative values from the cataract group in all colour axes. The colour contrast sensitivity was poorer in pseudophakes than in normals. There was a difference between the three groups of different IOL material used (PMMA, acrylic and silicone). The difference was significant in the protan axis, the acrylic group having the best colour contrast sensitivity. CONCLUSION: Peripheral colour contrast sensitivity was affected by cataract, even when only moderately developed. This finding is of importance and should be considered when the method is used to study other eye diseases e.g. glaucoma. Central colour contrast sensitivity was also affected by cataract. The pseudophakes were found to have poorer colour contrast sensitivity than normals. The material in the IOL seemed to be of importance for colour contrast.
Authors: A S Neubauer; K Samari-Kermani; U Schaller; U Welge-Lübetaen; G Rudolph; T Berninger Journal: Br J Ophthalmol Date: 2003-07 Impact factor: 4.638
Authors: Hadi Ostadimoghaddam; Akbar Fotouhi; Hassan Hashemi; Abbas Ali Yekta; Javad Heravian; Tahereh Abdolahinia; Reza Norouzi Rad; Soheila Asgari; Mehdi Khabazkhoob Journal: J Ophthalmic Vis Res Date: 2014-01
Authors: Ang Wei; Urmi V Mehta; Grazyna Palczewska; Anton M Palma; Vincent M Hussey; Luke E Hoffmann; Anna Diep; Kevin Nguyen; Bryan Le; Steven Yone-Shun Chang; Andrew W Browne Journal: Transl Vis Sci Technol Date: 2021-02-05 Impact factor: 3.283
Authors: Jasleen K Jolly; Luke Pratt; Aman K More; Jennifer Kwan; Rebecca L Jones; Robert E MacLaren; Sher Aslam Journal: Ophthalmol Sci Date: 2022-04-08
Authors: Chi-Ting Horng; Han-Ying Sun; Hsiang-Jui Liu; Jiann-Hwa Lue; Shang-Min Yeh Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2015-11-19 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Urmi Mehta; Anna Diep; Kevin Nguyen; Bryan Le; Clara Yuh; Caroline Frambach; John Doan; Ang Wei; Anton M Palma; Marjan Farid; Sumit Garg; Sanjay Kedhar; Matthew Wade; Kailey A Marshall; Kimberly A Jameson; M Cristina Kenney; Andrew W Browne Journal: Transl Vis Sci Technol Date: 2020-11-03 Impact factor: 3.283