Literature DB >> 11037800

Prospective CYP2D6 genotyping as an exclusion criterion for enrollment of a phase III clinical trial.

M P Murphy1, M E Beaman, L S Clark, M Cayouette, L Benson, D M Morris, J W Polli.   

Abstract

A phase III study was performed to compare the efficacy and safety of lamotrigine (Lamictal), desipramine (Norpramin), and placebo in the treatment of unipolar depression. Desipramine is extensively metabolized by cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6), and kinetics of this compound are altered in poor metabolizers. Genotyping was utilized to exclude poor metabolizers in order to increase subject safety and to eliminate the need to continuously monitor plasma desipramine levels. As part of screening, subjects were genotyped for the *3(A), *4(B), and *5(D) alleles, which identify approximately 95% of poor metabolizers. Extensive metabolizers were eligible for randomization to the lamotrigine, desipramine, or placebo arm. Follow-up genotyping for the *6(T) and *7(E) alleles was performed after study enrollment and was used to identify poor metabolizers who may have been incorrectly identified as extensive metabolizers upon initial three-allele screening. Of 628 subjects screened for *3(A), *4(B), *5(D) alleles, 590 (93.9%) were classified as extensive metabolizers. The remaining 38 (6.1%) subjects were poor metabolizers and excluded. Subsequent *6(T) and *7(E) testing revealed that two poor metabolizers had been enrolled, and the follow-up genotyping provided an explanation for the high desipramine plasma concentrations in one subject. No differences in phenotypic or allelic frequencies were found between the study population and literature populations. However, the frequency of poor metabolizers varied among clinical sites (0-15%). For a compound that is extensively metabolized by CYP2D6, prescreening subjects for *3(A), *4(B), *5(D), *6(T) and *7(E) alleles can increase subject safety and eliminate the need to continuously monitor drug plasma concentrations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11037800     DOI: 10.1097/00008571-200010000-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacogenetics        ISSN: 0960-314X


  6 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacogenomics and drug development.

Authors:  Yingying Guo; Steven Shafer; Paul Weller; Jonathan Usuka; Gary Peltz
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.533

Review 2.  Pharmacogenetics in drug regulation: promise, potential and pitfalls.

Authors:  Rashmi R Shah
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2005-08-29       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  The CYP4502D6 *4 and *6 alleles are the molecular genetic markers for drug response: implications in colchicine non-responder FMF patients.

Authors:  Sinem Yalcıntepe; Ozturk Ozdemır; Coskun Sılan; Filiz Ozen; Ahmet Uludag; Ferhan Candan; Fatma Sılan
Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 2.441

Review 4.  Genetic predictors of the clinical response to opioid analgesics: clinical utility and future perspectives.

Authors:  Jörn Lötsch; Carsten Skarke; Jürgen Liefhold; Gerd Geisslinger
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 5.  Pharmacogenetic aspects of drug-induced torsade de pointes: potential tool for improving clinical drug development and prescribing.

Authors:  Rashmi R Shah
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.606

6.  Development of neuroleptic agents: pharmacogenetics and current safety issues of regulatory concern.

Authors:  Rashmi Shah
Journal:  Dialogues Clin Neurosci       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 5.986

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.