Literature DB >> 11037719

FloSeal: a new hemostyptic agent in peripheral vascular surgery.

O Reuthebuch1, M L Lachat, P Vogt, U Schurr, M Turina.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Bleeding is a common and often severe side-effect in vascular surgery. The use of glue is widely accepted to achieve a dry surgical field. The application of sealant is limited when the surface is covered with blood. Aim of this study was to evaluate a new sealant (FloSeal) in patients undergoing vascular surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between June 1998 and July 1999 a total of 17 patients with peripheral vascular interventions was included in this investigation. Effectiveness was measured by bleeding severity prior and after application, time to hemostasis, amount of fusion matrix necessary for hemostasis, the potential need for additional hemostatic measures, or the need for reoperations to control the bleeding.
RESULTS: In 15 out of 17 patients bleeding was controlled with FloSeal alone, two patients required further surgical or hemostatic treatment. There were no local or systemic complications after use of this product.
CONCLUSION: FloSeal is an advantageous hemostatic tool.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11037719     DOI: 10.1024/0301-1526.29.3.204

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vasa        ISSN: 0301-1526            Impact factor:   1.961


  8 in total

1.  [Improvement of hemostasis in laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomy with gelatin thrombin matrix (FloSeal)].

Authors:  F Richter; M E Tüllmann; I Türk; S Deger; J Roigas; A Wille; D Schnorr
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2003-02-05       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Comparison of Floseal(r) and electrocautery in hemostasis after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Camilo Partezani Helito; Riccardo Gomes Gobbi; Lucas Machado Castrillon; Betina Bremer Hinkel; José Ricardo Pécora; Gilberto Luis Camanho
Journal:  Acta Ortop Bras       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 0.513

3.  Analysis of the hemostatic potential of modern topical sealants on arterial and venous anastomoses: an experimental porcine study.

Authors:  Hamidreza Fonouni; Arash Kashfi; Ali Majlesara; Oliver Stahlheber; Lukas Konstantinidis; Thomas W Kraus; Arianeb Mehrabi; Hani Oweira
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2017-07-28       Impact factor: 3.896

4.  Use of a haemostatic matrix does not reduce blood loss in minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Pierre-Emmanuel Schwab; Emmanuel Thienpont
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2015-01-26       Impact factor: 3.443

5.  The effectiveness of FloSeal matrix hemostatic agent in thyroid surgery: a prospective, randomized, control study.

Authors:  Mario Testini; Rinaldo Marzaioli; Germana Lissidini; Agostino Lippolis; Francesco Logoluso; Angela Gurrado; Domenica Lardo; Elisabetta Poli; Giuseppe Piccinni
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2009-05-07       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 6.  Comparison of hemostatic agents used in vascular surgery.

Authors:  Krishna S Vyas; Sibu P Saha
Journal:  Expert Opin Biol Ther       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 4.388

7.  Comparison of Floseal® and Tranexamic Acid for Bleeding Control after Total Knee Arthroplasty: a Prospective Randomized Study.

Authors:  Camilo Partezani Helito; Marcelo Batista Bonadio; Marcel Faraco Sobrado; Pedro Nogueira Giglio; José Ricardo Pécora; Gilberto Luis Camanho; Marco Kawamura Demange
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 2.365

8.  Hemostatic matrix effects on blood loss after total knee arthroplasty: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Alexander Di Francesco; Stefano Flamini; Filippo Fiori; Franco Mastri
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 1.251

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.