Literature DB >> 11037333

Linkage disequilibrium mapping: the role of population history, size, and structure.

N H Chapman1, E A Thompson.   

Abstract

Linkage disequilibrium mapping attempts to infer the location of a disease gene from observed associations between marker alleles and disease phenotype. This approach can be quite powerful when disease chromosomes are descended from a single founder mutation and the markers considered are tightly linked to the disease locus. The success of linkage disequilibrium map ping in fine-scale localization has led to the suggestion that genome-wide association testing might be useful in the detection of susceptibility genes for complex traits. Such studies would likely be performed in small, relatively isolated founder populations, where heterogeneity of the disease is less likely. To interpret the patterns of association observed in such populations, we need to understand the effect of population size, history, and structure on linkage disequilibrium. In this chapter, we first review measures of allelic association at a single locus. Measures of association between two loci are described, and some theoretical results are reviewed. We then consider some methods for inferring linkage between a marker and a rare disease, focusing on those that model the ancestry of the disease chromosomes. Next we discuss factors whose effect on disequilibrium are understood, and finally we describe the characteristics of some human populations that may be useful for disequilibrium mapping of complex traits.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11037333     DOI: 10.1016/s0065-2660(01)42034-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Genet        ISSN: 0065-2660            Impact factor:   1.944


  8 in total

1.  Genomewide linkage disequilibrium mapping of severe bipolar disorder in a population isolate.

Authors:  Roel A Ophoff; Michael A Escamilla; Susan K Service; Mitzi Spesny; Dar B Meshi; Wingman Poon; Julio Molina; Eduardo Fournier; Alvaro Gallegos; Carol Mathews; Thomas Neylan; Steven L Batki; Erin Roche; Margarita Ramirez; Sandra Silva; Melissa C De Mille; Penny Dong; Pedro E Leon; Victor I Reus; Lodewijk A Sandkuijl; Nelson B Freimer
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2002-07-15       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  The effect of population history on the lengths of ancestral chromosome segments.

Authors:  Nicola H Chapman; Elizabeth A Thompson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 3.  Microbial genome-enabled insights into plant-microorganism interactions.

Authors:  David S Guttman; Alice C McHardy; Paul Schulze-Lefert
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 4.  Systematic Review on Local Ancestor Inference From a Mathematical and Algorithmic Perspective.

Authors:  Jie Wu; Yangxiu Liu; Yiqiang Zhao
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 4.599

5.  Single nucleotide polymorphisms and linkage disequilibrium in sunflower.

Authors:  Judith M Kolkman; Simon T Berry; Alberto J Leon; Mary B Slabaugh; Shunxue Tang; Wenxiang Gao; David K Shintani; John M Burke; Steven J Knapp
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-07-29       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Prospects for whole genome linkage disequilibrium mapping in domestic dog breeds.

Authors:  Changbaig Hyun; Lucio J Filippich; Rod A Lea; Graeme Shepherd; Ian P Hughes; Lyn R Griffiths
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.957

7.  Mouse genome-wide association mapping needs linkage analysis to avoid false-positive Loci.

Authors:  Giacomo Manenti; Antonella Galvan; Angela Pettinicchio; Gaia Trincucci; Elena Spada; Anna Zolin; Silvano Milani; Anna Gonzalez-Neira; Tommaso A Dragani
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2009-01-09       Impact factor: 5.917

8.  High mammographic density in women of Ashkenazi Jewish descent.

Authors:  Jennifer L Caswell; Karla Kerlikowske; John A Shepherd; Steven R Cummings; Donglei Hu; Scott Huntsman; Elad Ziv
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2013-05-13       Impact factor: 6.466

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.