Literature DB >> 11037290

Segment interdependency and difficulty in two-stroke sequences.

M K Rand1, G E Stelmach.   

Abstract

We previously demonstrated that velocity and movement time for the initial segment for a two-stroke movement are scaled in relation to the difficulty of the second segment. The interdependent kinematic changes were interpreted as evidence that movement planning/organization processes consider the movement parameters of both segments when determining the movement characteristics of the entire sequence. In this experiment we examined two-stroke movements where the difficulty of the first segment had either a low or high level of difficulty to determine if the interdependent kinematic changes are diminished when parameter specification is high for the initial segment. Two-stroke arm movements toward defined targets were made in the horizontal plane on an x-y digitizer. The direction of the first segment was an elbow extension movement away from the trunk. The direction of the second segment varied between forearm extension and flexion movements. Two different indexes of difficulty (IDs) of the first segment and two of the second segment were created by varying target size. In the low ID condition for the first segment, movement duration of the initial segment lengthened and peak velocity decreased when the ID of the second segment was increased, and this pattern was found for both the extension-extension and extension-flexion sequences. In contrast, when the level of difficulty was high for the first segment, the interdependencies disappeared for the extension-extension sequence: movement duration and peak velocity were unaffected by the difficulty of the second segment. For the extension-flexion sequence, however, the interdependencies were found in the movement time of the initial segment but were eliminated in the peak velocity, i.e., movement time increased, but the peak velocity did not change. Furthermore, for both the extension-extension and extension-flexion sequences, the intersegment interval was lengthened as the level of difficulty increased. These findings suggest that difficulty of the initial segment affects how the motor planning/organization processes treat adjacent segments of the sequence. In particular, the data support the hypothesis that when the initial movement segment has a high index of difficulty, motor planning/organization processes appear to treat the adjacent segments separately as two discrete actions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11037290     DOI: 10.1007/s002210000450

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  7 in total

1.  Discrete and cyclical units of action in a mixed target pair aiming task.

Authors:  John J Buchanan; Jin-H Park; Young U Ryu; Charles H Shea
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-05-09       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Planning short pointing sequences.

Authors:  Philippe Vindras; Paolo Viviani
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-07-17       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Effects of hand termination and accuracy constraint on eye-hand coordination during sequential two-segment movements.

Authors:  Miya K Rand; George E Stelmach
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-10-22       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  The preparation and control of reversal movements as a single unit of action.

Authors:  Michael A Khan; Luc Tremblay; Darian T Cheng; Marlene Luis; Stuart J Mourton
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-01-30       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Effects of auditory feedback on movements with two-segment sequence and eye-hand coordination.

Authors:  Miya K Rand
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Segment interdependency and gaze anchoring during manual two-segment sequences.

Authors:  Miya K Rand
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-04-26       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Individual differences in motor planning during a multi-segment object manipulation task.

Authors:  Christian Seegelke; Charmayne M L Hughes; Christoph Schütz; Thomas Schack
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-08-11       Impact factor: 1.972

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.