Literature DB >> 11037214

Negotiating natural death in intensive care.

J E Seymour1.   

Abstract

Recent empirical evidence of barriers to palliative care in acute hospital settings shows that dying patients may receive invasive medical treatments immediately before death, in spite of evidence of their poor prognosis being available to clinicians. The difficulties of ascertaining treatment preferences, predicting the trajectory of dying in critically ill people, and assessing the degree to which further interventions are futile are well documented. Further, enduring ethical complexities attending end of life care mean that the process of withdrawing or withholding medical care is associated with significant problems for clinical staff. Specific difficulties attend the legitimation of treatment withdrawal, the perceived differences between 'killing' and 'letting die' and the cultural constraints which attend the orchestration of 'natural' death in situations where human agency is often required before death can follow dying. This paper draws on ethnographic research to examine the way in which these problems are resolved during medical work within intensive care. Building on insights from the literature, an analysis of observational case study data is presented which suggests that the negotiation of natural death in intensive care hinges upon four strategies. These, which form a framework with which to interpret social interaction between physicians during end of life decision-making in intensive care, are as follows: firstly, the establishment of a 'technical' definition of dying--informed by results of investigations and monitoring equipment--over and above 'bodily' dying informed by clinical experience. Secondly, the alignment of the trajectories of technical and bodily dying to ensure that the events of non-treatment have no perceived causative link to death. Thirdly, the balancing of medical action with non-action, allowing a diffusion of responsibility for death to the patient's body; and lastly, the incorporation of patient's companions and nursing staff into the decision-making process.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Death Benefit Pilot Programs; Empirical Approach

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11037214     DOI: 10.1016/s0277-9536(00)00042-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  11 in total

1.  Allow-natural-death (AND) orders: legal, ethical, and practical considerations.

Authors:  Maura C Schlairet; Richard W Cohen
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2013-06

2.  Should people die a natural death?

Authors:  Lars Sandman
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2005-12

3.  Cultural beliefs about a patient's right time to die: an exploratory study.

Authors:  Henry S Perkins; Josie D Cortez; Helen P Hazuda
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2009-10-02       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Epidemiology of death in the PICU at five U.S. teaching hospitals*.

Authors:  Jeffrey P Burns; Deborah E Sellers; Elaine C Meyer; Mithya Lewis-Newby; Robert D Truog
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 7.598

5.  Intensive care unit cultures and end-of-life decision making.

Authors:  Judith Gedney Baggs; Sally A Norton; Madeline H Schmitt; Mary T Dombeck; Craig R Sellers; Jill R Quinn
Journal:  J Crit Care       Date:  2007-02-08       Impact factor: 3.425

6.  The perspectives of clinical staff and bereaved informal care-givers on the use of continuous sedation until death for cancer patients: The study protocol of the UNBIASED study.

Authors:  Jane Seymour; Judith Rietjens; Jayne Brown; Agnes van der Heide; Sigrid Sterckx; Luc Deliens
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2011-03-04       Impact factor: 3.234

7.  Is a good death possible in Australian critical and acute settings?: physician experiences with end-of-life care.

Authors:  Steven A Trankle
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2014-08-18       Impact factor: 3.234

Review 8.  Appropriateness of intensive care treatments near the end of life during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Magnolia Cardona; Matthew Anstey; Ebony T Lewis; Shantiban Shanmugam; Ken Hillman; Alex Psirides
Journal:  Breathe (Sheff)       Date:  2020-06

9.  Development and evaluation of the feasibility and effects on staff, patients, and families of a new tool, the Psychosocial Assessment and Communication Evaluation (PACE), to improve communication and palliative care in intensive care and during clinical uncertainty.

Authors:  Irene J Higginson; Jonathan Koffman; Philip Hopkins; Wendy Prentice; Rachel Burman; Sara Leonard; Caroline Rumble; Jo Noble; Odette Dampier; William Bernal; Sue Hall; Myfanwy Morgan; Cathy Shipman
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 8.775

10.  Mismatch between physicians and family members views on communications about patients with chronic incurable diseases receiving care in critical and intensive care settings in Georgia: a quantitative observational survey.

Authors:  Nana Chikhladze; Elene Janberidze; Mariam Velijanashvili; Nikoloz Chkhartishvili; Memed Jintcharadze; Julia Verne; Dimitri Kordzaia
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 3.234

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.