Literature DB >> 11037151

Intrasynaptic ephaptic feedback in central synapses.

L L Voronin1.   

Abstract

Electrophysiological laboratory studies on rat visual cortex and hippocampus slices are reviewed. The aim was to confirm the existence of positive feedback in central synapses operating by an electrical (ephaptic) mechanism, as suggested by Byzov. Byzov's hypothesis holds that artificial hyperpolarization of the postsynaptic membrane potential should increase the amplitude of the excitatory postsynaptic current (EPSC) and potential (EPSP) in some central synapses not only by means of increases in the electromotive force (EMF). but also by means of increases in transmitter release from the presynaptic apparatus. Some experiments showed that hyperpolarization altered the parameters of presynaptic transmitter release, i.e., the quantity of "failed" responses N0, the coefficient of variation CV, and the quantum composition m of minimal EPSC and EPSP. The effect was particularly marked for EPSP in giant synapses formed by mossy fibers on neurons in field CA3. "Supralinear" functions were observed for these synapses in the relationship between EPSC amplitude and membrane potential in conditions of hyperpolarization of membrane potentials and in the relationship between presynaptic paired-stimulus facilitation and membrane potential. All of these "non-classical" effects disappeared when summed rather than minimal EPSC were evoked. The results are in agreement with computer experiments based on the Byzov model and are regarded as support for Byzov's hypothesis. Regardless of their explanation, the data obtained here demonstrate a new feedback mechanism for central synapses, which allows the postsynaptic neuron to control the efficiency of some synapses via changes in membrane potential. This mechanism can significantly increase the efficiency of large ("perforated") synapses and explains the increase in the number of this type of synapse after various experimental manipulations, such as those inducing long-term potentiation or forming conditioned reflexes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11037151     DOI: 10.1007/bf02462618

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol        ISSN: 0097-0549


  29 in total

Review 1.  [Electrical feedback in the chemical synapses].

Authors:  A L Byzov; V V Maksimov
Journal:  Ross Fiziol Zh Im I M Sechenova       Date:  1998-10

2.  [Quantum analysis does not confirm the increase in sensitivity of postsynaptic receptors in the late phase of hippocampal long term potentiation].

Authors:  L L Voronin; M V Sokolov; A V Astrelin; T Behnisch; K G Reymann
Journal:  Dokl Akad Nauk       Date:  1998-01

3.  Activation of metabotropic glutamate receptor type 2/3 suppresses transmission at rat hippocampal mossy fibre synapses.

Authors:  H Kamiya; H Shinozaki; C Yamamoto
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1996-06-01       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Use-dependent increases in glutamate concentration activate presynaptic metabotropic glutamate receptors.

Authors:  M Scanziani; P A Salin; K E Vogt; R C Malenka; R A Nicoll
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-02-13       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Relations between long-term synaptic modifications and paired-pulse interactions in the rat neocortex.

Authors:  M Volgushev; L L Voronin; M Chistiakova; W Singer
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 3.386

6.  Electrical feedback mechanism in the processing of signals in the outer plexiform layer of the retina.

Authors:  A L Byzov; T M Shura-Bura
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 7.  Molecular mechanisms controlling calcium entry through AMPA-type glutamate receptor channels.

Authors:  P Jonas; N Burnashev
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 8.  A synaptic model of memory: long-term potentiation in the hippocampus.

Authors:  T V Bliss; G L Collingridge
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1993-01-07       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 9.  Neurophysiological analysis of long-term potentiation in mammalian brain.

Authors:  L Voronin; A Byzov; A Kleschevnikov; M Kozhemyakin; U Kuhnt; M Volgushev
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  1995-01-23       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  A comparison of paired-pulsed facilitation of AMPA and NMDA receptor-mediated excitatory postsynaptic currents in the hippocampus.

Authors:  K A Clark; A D Randall; G L Collingridge
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Spinal control of motor outputs by intrinsic and externally induced electric field potentials.

Authors:  Elzbieta Jankowska
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Field effects in the CNS play functional roles.

Authors:  Shennan A Weiss; Donald S Faber
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2010-05-18       Impact factor: 3.492

3.  The adhesion function of the sodium channel beta subunit (β1) contributes to cardiac action potential propagation.

Authors:  Rengasayee Veeraraghavan; Gregory S Hoeker; Anita Alvarez-Laviada; Daniel Hoagland; Xiaoping Wan; D Ryan King; Jose Sanchez-Alonso; Chunling Chen; Jane Jourdan; Lori L Isom; Isabelle Deschenes; James W Smyth; Julia Gorelik; Steven Poelzing; Robert G Gourdie
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 8.140

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.