Literature DB >> 11036182

Acute and chronic electrical stimulation of the centromedian thalamic nucleus: modulation of reticulo-cortical systems and predictor factors for generalized seizure control.

M Velasco1, F Velasco, A L Velasco, F Jiménez, F Brito, I Márquez.   

Abstract

The present report recapitulates the clinical and electrophysiologic studies we have performed on patients with certain forms of medically intractable epilepsy to investigate the basic mechanisms and predictor factors for seizure control of the electrical stimulation of the thalamic centromedian nucleus (CM) procedure. Acute electrical stimulation of CM reveals that in humans, as in other animals, CM represents a thalamic relay of a reticulo-cortical system that participates crucially in wakefulness and attentive processes and in regulation of cortical excitability, as well as in the physiopathology of genuine generalized epileptic seizures. For example, unilateral, threshold, low-frequency (6/sec) stimulation of CM produced electrocortical incremental responses, while high-frequency (60/sec) stimulation of CM produced electroencephalogram (EEG) desynchronization and electronegative DC shifts with no behavioral counterparts. In contrast, combined suprathreshold low-frequency (3/sec) stimulation of CM on one side and of mesencephalic reticular stimulation on the other produced generalized spike-wave complex discharges accompanied by the symptoms of a typical absence attack, including motionless stare, eye blinking, and unresponsiveness of patients to a series of flashes under a simple response task. Chronic bilateral, threshold, high-frequency (60/sec) stimulation of CM significantly decreased the number of primary and secondary generalized tonic-clonic seizures and atypical absence attacks and the amount of interictal generalized EEG discharges in both. In addition, it improved the psychological performance of patients and normalized the EEG by increasing the frequency of background EEG activity. In contrast, chronic stimulation of CM reduced neither the number of complex partial seizures nor the epileptic EEG activities localized in the temporal region. Good outcomes of the chronic CM stimulation procedure were achieved depending on correct selection of patients and accuracy of ventriculographic stereotactic targets, as well as on periodic clinical and EEG evaluation and electrophysiologic monitoring of CM electrical stimulation reliability. However, the presence of 3- to 6-month long-lasting effects of CM stimulation made statistical evaluation of ON-OFF effects of CM stimulation under placebo, double-masked randomized experiments difficult.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11036182     DOI: 10.1016/s0188-4409(00)00085-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Med Res        ISSN: 0188-4409            Impact factor:   2.235


  12 in total

Review 1.  Deep brain and cortical stimulation for epilepsy.

Authors:  Mathieu Sprengers; Kristl Vonck; Evelien Carrette; Anthony G Marson; Paul Boon
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-07-18

2.  Treating refractory generalized epilepsy with stimulation.

Authors:  Lara E Jehi
Journal:  Epilepsy Curr       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 7.500

3.  Deep brain stimulation for epilepsy.

Authors:  Casey H Halpern; Uzma Samadani; Brian Litt; Jurg L Jaggi; Gordon H Baltuch
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 7.620

4.  Control of synchronization of brain dynamics leads to control of epileptic seizures in rodents.

Authors:  Levi B Good; Shivkumar Sabesan; Steven T Marsh; Kostas Tsakalis; David Treiman; Leon Iasemidis
Journal:  Int J Neural Syst       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 5.866

5.  Local suppression of epileptiform activity by electrical stimulation in rat hippocampus in vitro.

Authors:  Jun Lian; Marom Bikson; Christopher Sciortino; William C Stacey; Dominique M Durand
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2003-01-24       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Responsive neurostimulation for focal motor status epilepticus.

Authors:  Jimmy C Yang; Nitish M Harid; Fábio A Nascimento; Vasileios Kokkinos; Abigail Shaughnessy; Alice D Lam; M Brandon Westover; Thabele M Leslie-Mazwi; Leigh R Hochberg; Eric S Rosenthal; Andrew J Cole; Robert M Richardson; Sydney S Cash
Journal:  Ann Clin Transl Neurol       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 4.511

7.  Modulation of epileptic activity by deep brain stimulation: a model-based study of frequency-dependent effects.

Authors:  Faten Mina; Pascal Benquet; Anca Pasnicu; Arnaud Biraben; Fabrice Wendling
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 2.380

8.  Roles of adrenergic α1 and dopamine D1 and D2 receptors in the mediation of the desynchronization effects of modafinil in a mouse EEG synchronization model.

Authors:  Chang-Rui Chen; Su-Rong Yang; Yuan-Yuan Liu; Wei-Min Qu; Yoshihiro Urade; Zhi-Li Huang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Thalamo-cortical network underlying deep brain stimulation of centromedian thalamic nuclei in intractable epilepsy: a multimodal imaging analysis.

Authors:  Seong Hoon Kim; Sung Chul Lim; Dong Won Yang; Jeong Hee Cho; Byung-Chul Son; Jiyeon Kim; Seung Bong Hong; Young-Min Shon
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 2.570

10.  Deep brain stimulation for refractory epilepsy.

Authors:  Tomasz Tykocki; Tomasz Mandat; Anna Kornakiewicz; Henryk Koziara; Paweł Nauman
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2012-10-08       Impact factor: 3.318

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.