Literature DB >> 11035672

Association of body position with severity of apneic events in patients with severe nonpositional obstructive sleep apnea.

A Oksenberg1, I Khamaysi, D S Silverberg, A Tarasiuk.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To compare the severity of sleep apneic events occurring in the supine posture vs the severity of sleep apneic events occurring in the lateral posture in patients with severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA).
DESIGN: A retrospective analysis of apneic event variables in a group of 30 OSA patients who underwent a complete polysomnographic evaluation in our sleep disorders unit. PATIENTS: Thirty patients with severe OSA (respiratory disturbance index [RDI] = 70.1+/-18.2) who were nonpositional patients (NPP), ie, in whom the ratio of the supine RDI to the lateral RDI is < 2 (supine RDI = 85.7+/-11.7, lateral RDI = 64.8+/-17.3), and who had > or =30 apneic events in the lateral position and 30 apneic events in the supine position during sleep stage 2 were included in the study. MEASUREMENTS: For the 30 apneic events in each body position, the following variables were evaluated: apnea duration (ApDur), minimum desaturation (MinDes), Delta desaturation (Delta-Des), duration of arousal (DurArous), maximum snoring loudness (MaxSL), and Delta heart rate (Delta-HR). In addition, three other variables assessed as a ratio of ApDur (Rate-D = Delta-Des/ApDur, R-HR =Delta-HR/ApDur, and R-Arous = DurArous/ApDur) were also calculated.
RESULTS: For all variables evaluated, apneic events occurring in the supine posture were significantly more severe than those apneic events occurring in the lateral posture during sleep stage 2. ApDur of both body postures correlated significantly with DurArous, Delta-HR, and MaxSL, but not with Delta-Des and MinDes. ApDur correlated linearly with DurArous for both postures. The slopes of the two regression lines were similar (p = 0.578) but the regression line intercept for the supine apneas was significantly higher than that of lateral apneas (p<0.0001). In addition, the average number of supine apneic events that did not end with an arousal was smaller than the average number of lateral apneic events not ending with an arousal (4.4+/-6.0 vs. 10.5+/-6.7, respectively; p< 0.0001). Also, only 4 of 900 (0.44%) apneic events analyzed in the lateral posture ended with an awakening (> 15 s), whereas in the supine posture, there were 37 (4.1%) such events (p<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: These results show that even in patients with severe OSA who have a high number of apneic events in the supine and lateral posture, the apneic events occurring in the supine position are more severe than those occurring while sleeping in the lateral position. Thus, it is not only the number of apneic events that worsen in the supine sleep position but, probably no less important, the nature of the apneic events themselves.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11035672     DOI: 10.1378/chest.118.4.1018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chest        ISSN: 0012-3692            Impact factor:   9.410


  53 in total

Review 1.  Are sleep-related breathing disorders important contributing factors to the production of essential hypertension?

Authors:  D S Silverberg; A Oksenberg
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 5.369

2.  Complete denture wear during sleep in elderly sleep apnea patients--a preliminary study.

Authors:  Fernanda R Almeida; Ricardo Jun Furuyama; Danilo Chucralla Chaccur; Alan A Lowe; Hui Chen; Lia Rita Bittencourt; Maria L M A Frigeiro; Hiroko Tsuda
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 2.816

Review 3.  The undervalued potential of positional therapy in position-dependent snoring and obstructive sleep apnea-a review of the literature.

Authors:  M J L Ravesloot; J P van Maanen; L Dun; N de Vries
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2012-03-24       Impact factor: 2.816

4.  Sleep apnea, heart failure, and sleep position.

Authors:  Ozcan Ozeke; Cagatay Ertan; Ahmet Duran Demir
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 2.816

5.  REM-related obstructive sleep apnea: the effect of body position.

Authors:  Arie Oksenberg; Elena Arons; Khitam Nasser; Tatiana Vander; Henryk Radwan
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2010-08-15       Impact factor: 4.062

Review 6.  A review of signals used in sleep analysis.

Authors:  A Roebuck; V Monasterio; E Gederi; M Osipov; J Behar; A Malhotra; T Penzel; G D Clifford
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 2.833

7.  Responsiveness of jaw motor activation to arousals during sleep in patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome.

Authors:  Takafumi Kato; Takeshi Katase; Shuichiro Yamashita; Hideko Sugita; Hisae Muraki; Akira Mikami; Mutsumi Okura; Motoharu Ohi; Yuji Masuda; Mitsutaka Taniguchi
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 4.062

8.  Morbidity and mortality risk ratios are elevated in severe supine dominant OSA: a long-term follow-up study.

Authors:  Antti Kulkas; Anu Muraja-Murro; Pekka Tiihonen; Esa Mervaala; Juha Töyräs
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 2.816

9.  Influence of interface and position on upper airway collapsibility assessed by negative expiratory pressure.

Authors:  Raquel Pastrello Hirata; Fabiane Kayamori; Fabiola Schorr; Henrique Takachi Moriya; Salvatore Romano; Giuseppe Insalaco; Eloisa Gebrim; Luis Vicente Franco de Oliveira; Pedro Rodrigues Genta; Geraldo Lorenzi-Filho
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2017-01-07       Impact factor: 2.816

10.  The impact of body posture and sleep stages on sleep apnea severity in adults.

Authors:  Nathaniel A Eiseman; M Brandon Westover; Jeffrey M Ellenbogen; Matt T Bianchi
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2012-12-15       Impact factor: 4.062

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.