Literature DB >> 11035314

Should the definition of preeclampsia include a rise in diastolic blood pressure of >/=15 mm Hg to a level <90 mm Hg in association with proteinuria?

R J Levine1, M G Ewell, J C Hauth, L B Curet, P M Catalano, C D Morris, G Choudhary, B M Sibai.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to compare baseline characteristics and pregnancy outcomes between normotensive women who did and those who did not have a rise in diastolic blood pressure of >/=15 mm Hg in association with proteinuria. STUDY
DESIGN: We studied 4302 healthy nulliparous women from the Calcium for Preeclampsia Prevention trial who were delivered at >/=20 weeks' gestation. We selected as the study group normotensive women who developed proteinuria within 7 days of a rise in diastolic blood pressure of >/=15 mm Hg with respect to baseline on 2 occasions 4 to 168 hours apart. Baseline blood pressure was the mean of measurements at 2 clinic visits before 22 weeks' gestation. Other normotensive women used for comparison were those who did not develop gestational hypertension or a rise in diastolic blood pressure of >/=15 mm Hg in association with proteinuria.
RESULTS: Except for greater weight (P <.001), body mass index (P <.001), and systolic blood pressure (P =.05) the baseline characteristics of the 82 women with a rise in diastolic blood pressure of >/=15 mm Hg in association with proteinuria did not differ significantly from those of the other normotensive women. Although they had a greater rate of weight gain (P <.005), larger babies (P =.06), and a 2-fold increase in abdominal delivery (P <.001), there was little other evidence of adverse pregnancy outcomes among these women.
CONCLUSION: During normotensive pregnancy a rise in diastolic blood pressure of >/=15 mm Hg in association with proteinuria appears to be benign and is not a useful clinical construct.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11035314     DOI: 10.1067/mob.2000.108865

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  6 in total

1.  Pre-eclampsia but not pregnancy-induced hypertension is a risk factor for diabetic nephropathy in type 1 diabetic women.

Authors:  D Gordin; V Hiilesmaa; J Fagerudd; M Rönnback; C Forsblom; R Kaaja; K Teramo; P-H Groop
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2007-01-10       Impact factor: 10.122

2.  Clustering Longitudinal Blood Pressure Trajectories to Examine Heterogeneity in Outcomes Among Preeclampsia Cases and Controls.

Authors:  Kyle R Roell; Quaker E Harmon; Kari Klungsøyr; Anna E Bauer; Per Magnus; Stephanie M Engel
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2021-04-05       Impact factor: 9.897

3.  The levels of circulating vascular endothelial growth factor and soluble Flt-1 in pregnancies complicated by preeclampsia.

Authors:  Eun Sung Lee; Min-Jeong Oh; Jae Won Jung; Ji-Eun Lim; Hyun-Joo Seol; Kyung-Ju Lee; Hai-Joong Kim
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.153

4.  Prediction of pre-eclampsia: a protocol for systematic reviews of test accuracy.

Authors:  Jeltsje S Cnossen; Joris A M van der Post; Ben W J Mol; Khalid S Khan; Catherine A Meads; Gerben ter Riet
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2006-10-19       Impact factor: 3.007

5.  Results of a Five-Year Experience in First Trimester Preeclampsia Screening.

Authors:  Stella Capriglione; Ferdinando Antonio Gulino; Silvia Latella; Giovanna De Felice; Maurizio Filippini; Miriam Farinelli; Francesco Giuseppe Martire; Elsa Viora
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 4.964

6.  Blood pressure change across pregnancy in white British and Pakistani women: analysis of data from the Born in Bradford cohort.

Authors:  Diane Farrar; Gillian Santorelli; Debbie A Lawlor; Derek Tuffnell; Trevor A Sheldon; Jane West; Corrie Macdonald-Wallis
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.