Literature DB >> 11034860

The effect of switching between sequential and repetitive movements on cortical activation.

L Jäncke1, M Himmelbach, N J Shah, K Zilles.   

Abstract

We used whole-head functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to investigate the effect of switching between different sequential and repetitive movements in the context of conditional and fixed tasks. Four different movement tasks were applied: (1) unpredictable switching between two movement sequences comprising six submovements each according to visual cues (SEQ-VC); (2) unpredictable switching between repetitive movement of one finger according to visual cues (REP-VC); (3) performance of the same sequential movements used for SEQ-VC but in a fixed mode triggered by a visual stimulus (SEQ-FIX); (4) performance of the repetitive movements used for REP-FIX but in a fixed mode by a visual stimulus (REP-FIX). The statistical group analysis of the hemodynamic responses revealed the following results: (1) the SEQ-VC compared to the SEQ-FIX condition (switching between movement sequences) engendered stronger activations in the left rostral supplementary motor area (pre-SMA), bilaterally in the posterior parietal lobule, the left ventral premotor area, and the visual cortices; (2) the REP-VC compared to the REP-FIX condition (switching between repetitive movements) only revealed stronger activation in extra-striate areas. We hypothesize that during switching of movement sequences higher motor control aspects are involved including movement selection, updating of motor plans, as well as recalling and restoring motor plans. The repetitive movements are too simple in order to evoke additional activations in the medial and lateral premotor areas, as well as in parietal areas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11034860     DOI: 10.1006/nimg.2000.0626

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  10 in total

1.  Comparing brain activation associated with isolated upper and lower limb movement across corresponding joints.

Authors:  Andreas R Luft; Gerald V Smith; Larry Forrester; Jill Whitall; Richard F Macko; Till-Karsten Hauser; Andrew P Goldberg; Daniel F Hanley
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Neural correlates of switching set as measured in fast, event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Anna B Smith; Eric Taylor; Mick Brammer; Katya Rubia
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Involvement of the inferior frontal junction in cognitive control: meta-analyses of switching and Stroop studies.

Authors:  Jan Derrfuss; Marcel Brass; Jane Neumann; D Yves von Cramon
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Extensive training of elementary finger tapping movements changes the pattern of motor cortex excitability.

Authors:  S Koeneke; K Lutz; U Herwig; U Ziemann; L Jäncke
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-04-08       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Three-dimensional locations and boundaries of motor and premotor cortices as defined by functional brain imaging: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mary A Mayka; Daniel M Corcos; Sue E Leurgans; David E Vaillancourt
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-03-29       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Functional connectivity patterns during motor behaviour: the impact of past on present activity.

Authors:  Deborah J Serrien
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Domain general and domain preferential brain regions associated with different types of task switching: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Chobok Kim; Sara E Cilles; Nathan F Johnson; Brian T Gold
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-03-09       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Conversation effects on neural mechanisms underlying reaction time to visual events while viewing a driving scene using MEG.

Authors:  Susan M Bowyer; Li Hsieh; John E Moran; Richard A Young; Arun Manoharan; Chia-cheng Jason Liao; Kiran Malladi; Ya-Ju Yu; Yow-Ren Chiang; Norman Tepley
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2008-10-11       Impact factor: 3.252

9.  A domain-independent source of cognitive control for task sets: shifting spatial attention and switching categorization rules.

Authors:  Yu-Chin Chiu; Steven Yantis
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-03-25       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  The SwAD-Task - An Innovative Paradigm for Measuring Costs of Switching Between Different Attentional Demands.

Authors:  Magnus Liebherr; Stephanie Antons; Matthias Brand
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-10-04
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.