Literature DB >> 11034779

Mifepristone for induction of labour.

J P Neilson1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The steroid hormone, progesterone, inhibits contractions of the uterus. Antiprogestins (including mifepristone) have been developed to antagonise the action of progesterone, and these have a recognised role in medical termination of early or mid-pregnancy. Animal studies have suggested that mifepristone may also have a role in inducing labour in late pregnancy.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the effects of mifepristone for third trimester cervical ripening or induction of labour. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group trials register, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, and reference lists of relevant papers. SELECTION CRITERIA: Selection criteria included: (1) clinical trials comparing mifepristone used for third trimester cervical ripening or labour induction with placebo/no treatment or other labour induction methods; (2) random allocation to the treatment or control group; (3) adequate allocation concealment; (4) violations of allocated management not sufficient to materially affect conclusions; (5) clinically meaningful outcome measures reported; (6) data available for analysis according to the random allocation; (7) missing data insufficient to materially affect the conclusions. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: This is one of a series of reviews of methods of cervical ripening and labour induction using standardised methodology. Data were extracted by the reviewer and, independently, by a colleague. MAIN
RESULTS: Seven trials, that recruited 594 women, are included. All trials compared mifepristone with placebo, except for one that compared mifepristone with no treatment. Compared to placebo, mifepristone treated women were less likely to have an unfavourable cervix at 48 hours (relative risk [RR] 0.36, 95% confidence intervals [CI] 0.2-0.63) or 96 hours (RR 0.39, 95% CI 0.23-0.66). Mifepristone treated women were more likely to have delivered within 48 and 96 hours of treatment than were placebo treated/no treatment women - 48 hours: RR 2.82, 95% CI 1.82-4.36; 96 hours: RR 3.40, 95% CI 1.96-5.92. Mifepristone treated women were less likely to undergo caesarean section (RR 0.71, 95% CI 0.53-0.95). There is little information about fetal outcome, although there was no evidence that neonatal hypoglycaemia might be more common after exposure to mifepristone. Similarly, there is little information about maternal side-effects although some nausea and vomiting was reported in one trial. REVIEWER'S
CONCLUSIONS: There is insufficient information available from clinical trials to support the use of mifepristone to induce labour. However, available data do show that mifepristone is better than placebo at ripening the cervix, and inducing labour. There is evidence of a possible reduction in the incidence of caesarean section following mifepristone treatment (compared to placebo) that would justify further trials. We found no trials that compared mifepristone with alternative methods of inducing labour e.g. prostaglandins.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11034779     DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002865

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev        ISSN: 1361-6137


  12 in total

Review 1.  Oestrogens alone or with amniotomy for cervical ripening or induction of labour.

Authors:  J Thomas; A J Kelly; J Kavanagh
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2001

2.  Progesterone receptor-A and -B have opposite effects on proinflammatory gene expression in human myometrial cells: implications for progesterone actions in human pregnancy and parturition.

Authors:  Huiqing Tan; Lijuan Yi; Neal S Rote; William W Hurd; Sam Mesiano
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 5.958

Review 3.  Genomics of preterm birth.

Authors:  Kayleigh A Swaggart; Mihaela Pavlicev; Louis J Muglia
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2015-02-02       Impact factor: 6.915

4.  Morning versus evening induction of labour for improving outcomes.

Authors:  Jannet Jh Bakker; Ben Willem J Mol; Maria Pel; Joris Am van der Post
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2009

Review 5.  Progestin treatment for the prevention of preterm birth.

Authors:  Miha Lucovnik; Ruben J Kuon; Linda R Chambliss; William L Maner; Shao-Qing Shi; Leili Shi; James Balducci; Robert E Garfield
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2011-06-27       Impact factor: 3.636

Review 6.  Extra-amniotic prostaglandin for induction of labour.

Authors:  E Hutton; E Mozurkewich
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2001

7.  Human labor is associated with reduced decidual cell expression of progesterone, but not glucocorticoid, receptors.

Authors:  C J Lockwood; C Stocco; W Murk; U A Kayisli; E F Funai; F Schatz
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2010-03-17       Impact factor: 5.958

8.  Demystifying animal models of adverse pregnancy outcomes: touching bench and bedside.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Bonney
Journal:  Am J Reprod Immunol       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 3.886

Review 9.  Novel concepts on pregnancy clocks and alarms: redundancy and synergy in human parturition.

Authors:  Ramkumar Menon; Elizabeth A Bonney; Jennifer Condon; Sam Mesiano; Robert N Taylor
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 15.610

Review 10.  Reducing stillbirths: interventions during labour.

Authors:  Gary L Darmstadt; Mohammad Yawar Yakoob; Rachel A Haws; Esme V Menezes; Tanya Soomro; Zulfiqar A Bhutta
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2009-05-07       Impact factor: 3.007

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.