H Elphick1, K Southern. 1. Institute of Child Health, Alder Hey Children's Hospital, Eaton Road, Liverpool, UK. helphick@liverpool.ac.uk
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Allergic Bronchopulmonary Aspergillosis (ABPA) is an allergic reaction to colonisation of the lungs with the fungus Aspergillus fumigatus and affects around 10% people with cystic fibrosis. ABPA is associated with an accelerated decline in lung function. Corticosteroids, in high doses, are the main treatment for ABPA although the long-term benefits are not clear and their many side effects are well documented. A group of compounds, the azoles, have activity against Aspergillus fumigatus and have been proposed as an alternative treatment for ABPA. Of this group, Itraconazole is the most active. A separate antifungal compound, Amphotericin B has been employed in aerosolised form to treat invasive infection with Aspergillus fumigatus, and may have potential for the treatment of ABPA. Antifungal therapy for ABPA in cystic fibrosis needs to be evaluated. OBJECTIVES: The review tested the hypotheses that antifungal interventions for the treatment of ABPA in cystic fibrosis: 1. improve clinical status compared to placebo or standard therapy (no placebo); 2. do not have unacceptable adverse effects. If benefit was demonstrated, the optimal type, duration and dose of antifungal therapy was assessed. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group specialist trials register which comprises references identified from comprehensive electronic database searches, handsearching relevant journals and handsearching abstract books of conference proceedings. In addition, pharmaceutical companies were approached. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials, published or unpublished, where antifungal treatments have been compared to either placebo or no treatment, or where different doses of the same treatment have been used in the treatment of ABPA in patients with cystic fibrosis. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: No completed randomised controlled trials were identified. MAIN RESULTS: No completed randomised controlled trials were identified. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: At present, there are no randomised controlled trials to evaluate the use of antifungal therapies for the treatment of ABPA in people with cystic fibrosis. Trials with clear outcome measures are needed to properly evaluate this potentially useful treatment for cystic fibrosis.
BACKGROUND:Allergic Bronchopulmonary Aspergillosis (ABPA) is an allergic reaction to colonisation of the lungs with the fungus Aspergillus fumigatus and affects around 10% people with cystic fibrosis. ABPA is associated with an accelerated decline in lung function. Corticosteroids, in high doses, are the main treatment for ABPA although the long-term benefits are not clear and their many side effects are well documented. A group of compounds, the azoles, have activity against Aspergillus fumigatus and have been proposed as an alternative treatment for ABPA. Of this group, Itraconazole is the most active. A separate antifungal compound, Amphotericin B has been employed in aerosolised form to treat invasive infection with Aspergillus fumigatus, and may have potential for the treatment of ABPA. Antifungal therapy for ABPA in cystic fibrosis needs to be evaluated. OBJECTIVES: The review tested the hypotheses that antifungal interventions for the treatment of ABPA in cystic fibrosis: 1. improve clinical status compared to placebo or standard therapy (no placebo); 2. do not have unacceptable adverse effects. If benefit was demonstrated, the optimal type, duration and dose of antifungal therapy was assessed. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group specialist trials register which comprises references identified from comprehensive electronic database searches, handsearching relevant journals and handsearching abstract books of conference proceedings. In addition, pharmaceutical companies were approached. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials, published or unpublished, where antifungal treatments have been compared to either placebo or no treatment, or where different doses of the same treatment have been used in the treatment of ABPA in patients with cystic fibrosis. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: No completed randomised controlled trials were identified. MAIN RESULTS: No completed randomised controlled trials were identified. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: At present, there are no randomised controlled trials to evaluate the use of antifungal therapies for the treatment of ABPA in people with cystic fibrosis. Trials with clear outcome measures are needed to properly evaluate this potentially useful treatment for cystic fibrosis.
Authors: Kristie Cramer; Natasha Wiebe; Virginia Moyer; Lisa Hartling; Katrina Williams; George Swingler; Terry P Klassen Journal: BMC Pediatr Date: 2005-09-21 Impact factor: 2.125