Literature DB >> 11033037

Common errors in the use of magnetic resonance imaging for neuro-ophthalmic diagnosis.

R J Wolintz1, J D Trobe, W T Cornblath, S S Gebarski, A S Mark, M P Kolsky.   

Abstract

The optimal utilization of magnetic resonance imaging in neuro-ophthalmic diagnosis is limited by errors in prescribing and interpreting scans. In a review of case material, we discovered four common prescriptive errors: 1) failure to apply a dedicated study, 2) inappropriate use of a dedicated study, 3) omission of intravenous contrast, and 4) omission of specialized sequences. The four common interpretive errors were the following: 1) failure to detect the lesion because of misleading clinical information, 2) rejection of a clinical diagnosis because an expected imaging abnormality was absent, 3) assumption that a striking imaging abnormality accounted for the clinical abnormality, and 4) failure to consider the lack of clinical specificity of imaging abnormalities. Many of these errors could be avoided by improved communication between clinicians and radiologists.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11033037     DOI: 10.1016/s0039-6257(00)00147-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0039-6257            Impact factor:   6.048


  6 in total

Review 1.  Diagnostic error and neuro-ophthalmology.

Authors:  Leanne Stunkel; Nancy J Newman; Valérie Biousse
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurol       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 5.710

2.  Neuroimaging in patients referred to a neuro-ophthalmology service: the rates of appropriateness and concordance in interpretation.

Authors:  Collin McClelland; Gregory P Van Stavern; J Banks Shepherd; Mae Gordon; Julia Huecker
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2012-04-06       Impact factor: 12.079

3.  Uveal melanoma: evaluation of extrascleral extension using thin-section MR of the eye with surface coils.

Authors:  Tommaso Tartaglione; Monica Maria Pagliara; Mariacarmela Sciandra; Carmela Grazia Caputo; Rosalinda Calandrelli; Gina Fabrizi; Simona Gaudino; Maria Antonietta Blasi; Cesare Colosimo
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 3.469

4.  Imaging in neuro-ophthalmology: An overview.

Authors:  Anupam Kumar Kakaria
Journal:  Oman J Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-05

5.  Orbital imaging - Scanning a patient, reading a disease.

Authors:  Santosh G Honavar
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 1.848

Review 6.  Diagnostic Error in Neuro-ophthalmology: Avenues to Improve.

Authors:  Elena A Muro-Fuentes; Leanne Stunkel
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 6.030

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.