Literature DB >> 11032624

Alzheimer's disease and frontotemporal dementia are differentiated by discriminant analysis applied to (99m)Tc HmPAO SPECT data.

P Charpentier1, I Lavenu, L Defebvre, A Duhamel, P Lecouffe, F Pasquier, M Steinling.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Alzheimer's disease (AD) and frontotemporal dementia (FTD) are the most frequent neurodegenerative cognitive disorders. However, FTD remains poorly recognised clinically. The use of (99m)HmPAO-single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) has been demonstrated in the differentiation of AD and FTD. Nethertheless, there are very few comparative studies designed to assess its precise value in this differential diagnosis. The aim was to determine a simple decision rule, deduced from statistical analysis, which, if applied to regions of interest (ROIs) and mini mental state examination (MMSE), could improve the predictive value of SPECT in differential diagnosis between AD and FTD.
METHODS: Forty patients, 20 with probable AD and 20 with probable FTD were included. All patients underwent brain SPECT imaging, after an intravenous injection of (99m)Tc HmPAO-(555mBq). For each patient, 20 ROIs were determined on the Fleishig's slice and their activity was normalised to the mean cerebellar activity. Bivariate analysis (Wilcoxon rank tests) and multivariate analysis (stepwise discriminant analysis) were performed to determine the subgroup of variables able to give the highest predictive value for this differential diagnosis. A simple decision rule was built from a predictive score derived by factorial discriminant analysis.
RESULTS: As previously described, the fixation defect was found in frontal regions of interest (ROIs) in FTD and in the left temporoparietal-occipital ROIs in AD. Among the 21 variables, five were finally selected: right median frontal, left lateral frontal, left tempoparietal, left temporoparietal-occipital areas, and MMSE. One hundred per cent of patients with FTD were correctly classified by the decision rule (20/20 patients) and 90% of patients with AD (18/20).
CONCLUSION: AD and FTD are differentiated by SPECT. Automatic classification based on a decision rule deduced from factorial discriminant analysis could enhance its performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11032624      PMCID: PMC1763418          DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.69.5.661

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry        ISSN: 0022-3050            Impact factor:   10.154


  15 in total

1.  Alzheimer's disease and frontal variant of frontotemporal dementia-- a very brief battery for cognitive and behavioural distinction.

Authors:  Roberta Perri; Giacomo Koch; Giovanni A Carlesimo; Laura Serra; Lucia Fadda; Patrizio Pasqualetti; Carla Pettenati; Carlo Caltagirone
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2005-05-23       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 2.  Neuropsychological differences between frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer's disease: a review.

Authors:  Michal Harciarek; Krzysztof Jodzio
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 7.444

3.  Cognitive and SPECT characteristics predict progression of Parkinson's disease in newly diagnosed patients.

Authors:  Kathy Dujardin; Luc Defebvre; Alain Duhamel; Pascal Lecouffe; Pascal Rogelet; Marc Steinling; Alain Destée
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.849

4.  A visual [18F]FDG-PET rating scale for the differential diagnosis of frontotemporal lobar degeneration.

Authors:  Stefan Poljansky; Bernd Ibach; Barbara Hirschberger; Peter Männer; Hans Klünemann; Göran Hajak; Jörg Marienhagen
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 5.270

5.  Hypoperfusion in frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer disease by arterial spin labeling MRI.

Authors:  A T Du; G H Jahng; S Hayasaka; J H Kramer; H J Rosen; M L Gorno-Tempini; K P Rankin; B L Miller; M W Weiner; N Schuff
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2006-10-10       Impact factor: 9.910

6.  Diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease using brain perfusion SPECT and MR imaging: which modality achieves better diagnostic accuracy?

Authors:  Takao Kubota; Yo Ushijima; Kei Yamada; Chio Okuyama; Osamu Kizu; Tsunehiko Nishimura
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-11-20       Impact factor: 9.236

7.  Accuracy of single-photon emission computed tomography in differentiating frontotemporal dementia from Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  R McNeill; G M Sare; M Manoharan; H J Testa; D M A Mann; D Neary; J S Snowden; A R Varma
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2006-12-08       Impact factor: 10.154

8.  Differential diagnosis of dementia with Lewy Bodies and Alzheimer Disease using combined MR imaging and brain perfusion single-photon emission tomography.

Authors:  H Goto; K Ishii; T Uemura; N Miyamoto; T Yoshikawa; K Shimada; S Ohkawa
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2010-01-14       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 9.  Systematic review of the diagnostic utility of SPECT imaging in dementia.

Authors:  Jing Ming Yeo; Xuxin Lim; Zubair Khan; Suvankar Pal
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 5.270

10.  White matter damage in frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer's disease measured by diffusion MRI.

Authors:  Yu Zhang; Norbert Schuff; An-Tao Du; Howard J Rosen; Joel H Kramer; Maria Luisa Gorno-Tempini; Bruce L Miller; Michael W Weiner
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2009-05-12       Impact factor: 13.501

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.