Literature DB >> 11030534

Therapeutic efficacy of Dornier MPL 9000 for prevesical calculi as judged by efficiency quotient.

M H Ather1, A Memon.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To study the efficacy and safety of the Dornier MPL 9000 lithotripter in the treatment of prevesical calculi using real-time ultrasound monitoring and to see if efficacy is adequately judged by the efficiency quotient (EQ). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy-six patients underwent ultrasound-guided extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) for prevesical calculi over a period of 43 months. Their age ranged from 8 to 68 (mean 37.6) years, and the male:female ratio was 2.6:1. The size of the stones, measured in two dimensions, ranged from 4 to 25 mm (mean 9.3 mm) and 2 to 15 mm (mean 6.0 mm). No general or regional anesthesia or ureteral stents were used, and all patients were treated in the prone position. The EQ was calculated using the formula: Stone free (%) x 100/(100 + retreatment rate (%) + auxiliary procedures (%).
RESULTS: Seventy patients were stone free in a mean time of 15 +/- 14.11 days. The average number of shockwaves used was 2,831 +/- 1,612, and the average number of sessions per patient was 1.7. About 92% of the patients were rendered stone free using in situ SWL alone. No major complication was encountered, and none of the patients required an inpatient stay after SWL. The EQ was 65. Five patients with failed SWL subsequently were rendered stone free, four with salvage ureteroscopy and pneumatic lithotripsy and one with cystolitholapaxy for a symptomatic fragment in the bladder. One patient was lost to follow-up.
CONCLUSION: In situ SWL is a safe and effective treatment for prevesical calculi. It should be used as a first-line treatment for most such stones. Efficiency can be assessed objectively by the EQ.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11030534     DOI: 10.1089/08927790050152122

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  4 in total

Review 1.  Removal of ureteral stones with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopic procedures. What can we learn from the literature in terms of results and treatment efforts?

Authors:  Hans-Göran Tiselius
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2005-05-29

2.  Comparison of intermediate- and low-frequency shock wave lithotripsy for pediatric kidney stones.

Authors:  Onur Kaygısız; Hakan Kılıçarslan; Ahmet Mert; Burhan Coşkun; Yakup Kordan
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2017-07-29       Impact factor: 3.436

3.  Which frequency is better for pediatric shock wave lithotripsy? Intermediate or low: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Onur Kaygisiz; Mehmet Cagatay Cicek; Ahmet Mert; Selcan Akesen; Emre Sarandol; Hakan Kilicarslan
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  What is the optimal frequency in shock wave lithotripsy for pediatric renal stones? A prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Murat Tuncer; Alper Kafkaslı; Utku Can; Alper Çoşkun; Bilal Eryıldırım; Kemal Sarica
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 3.436

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.