OBJECTIVE: To examine the utility of the WeeFIM instrument ("WeeFIM") in detecting changes in the functional status of children with disability. DESIGN: Prospective longitudinal design with correlation and responsiveness analysis. SETTING: Three facilities providing services to children with developmental disabilities in western New York State. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred five children (72 girls, 133 boys) with identified medical disabilities receiving special services were administered the WeeFIM. Subjects ranged in age from 11 to 87 months and came from diverse socioeconomic and ethnic backgrounds. Scores for 174 children were available for 3 administrations performed over a 1-year period. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The responsiveness of the WeeFIM instrument was examined using 5 statistical procedures: Reliability Change Index, Proportional Change Index, effect size, standardized response means, and paired t tests. RESULTS: All 5 indexes of responsiveness indicated statistically significant (p < .05) or reliable changes over time. The transfer subscale of the WeeFIM showed a skewed distribution that affected the results for some responsiveness indexes. The advantage, limitations, and assumptions of the responsiveness indexes are described and graphic examples of change over time are presented to validate the responsiveness of the WeeFIM instrument. CONCLUSION: The WeeFIM instrument showed the ability to document change in functional abilities over a 1-year period in children with chronic disabilities.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the utility of the WeeFIM instrument ("WeeFIM") in detecting changes in the functional status of children with disability. DESIGN: Prospective longitudinal design with correlation and responsiveness analysis. SETTING: Three facilities providing services to children with developmental disabilities in western New York State. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred five children (72 girls, 133 boys) with identified medical disabilities receiving special services were administered the WeeFIM. Subjects ranged in age from 11 to 87 months and came from diverse socioeconomic and ethnic backgrounds. Scores for 174 children were available for 3 administrations performed over a 1-year period. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The responsiveness of the WeeFIM instrument was examined using 5 statistical procedures: Reliability Change Index, Proportional Change Index, effect size, standardized response means, and paired t tests. RESULTS: All 5 indexes of responsiveness indicated statistically significant (p < .05) or reliable changes over time. The transfer subscale of the WeeFIM showed a skewed distribution that affected the results for some responsiveness indexes. The advantage, limitations, and assumptions of the responsiveness indexes are described and graphic examples of change over time are presented to validate the responsiveness of the WeeFIM instrument. CONCLUSION: The WeeFIM instrument showed the ability to document change in functional abilities over a 1-year period in children with chronic disabilities.
Authors: Thomas Noh; Manuel S Vogt; David W Pruitt; Trent R Hummel; Francesco T Mangano Journal: Childs Nerv Syst Date: 2018-05-25 Impact factor: 1.475
Authors: Stephen R McCauley; Elisabeth A Wilde; Vicki A Anderson; Gary Bedell; Sue R Beers; Thomas F Campbell; Sandra B Chapman; Linda Ewing-Cobbs; Joan P Gerring; Gerard A Gioia; Harvey S Levin; Linda J Michaud; Mary R Prasad; Bonnie R Swaine; Lyn S Turkstra; Shari L Wade; Keith O Yeates Journal: J Neurotrauma Date: 2011-08-24 Impact factor: 5.269
Authors: George Edwin Gorton; Mark F Abel; Donna J Oeffinger; Anita Bagley; Sarah P Rogers; Diane Damiano; Mark Romness; Chester Tylkowski Journal: J Pediatr Orthop Date: 2009-12 Impact factor: 2.324
Authors: D Oeffinger; A Bagley; S Rogers; G Gorton; R Kryscio; M Abel; D Damiano; D Barnes; C Tylkowski Journal: Dev Med Child Neurol Date: 2008-12 Impact factor: 5.449
Authors: Ryanne J M Lemmens; Annick A A Timmermans; Yvonne J M Janssen-Potten; Rob J E M Smeets; Henk A M Seelen Journal: BMC Neurol Date: 2012-04-12 Impact factor: 2.474
Authors: Eric T Caliendo; Nayoung Kim; David Edasery; Gulce Askin; Sophie Nowak; Linda M Gerber; Katherine T Baum; Laura S Blackwell; Christine H Koterba; Kristen R Hoskinson; Brad G Kurowski; Matthew McLaughlin; Sarah J Tlustos; William D Watson; Sumit N Niogi; Stacy J Suskauer; Sudhin A Shah Journal: J Neurotrauma Date: 2021-03-01 Impact factor: 4.869