Literature DB >> 11029730

Ratings of profile attractiveness after functional appliance treatment.

K O'Neill1, M Harkness, R Knight.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the change in profile attractiveness in children with Class II Division 1 malocclusion after 18 months' treatment with functional appliances. Changes in profile attractiveness were assessed by panels of art students, dental students, and parents of orthodontic patients. Each panel consisted of an equal number of male and female raters. The raters first decided whether the initial or 18-month profile silhouette was more attractive, and then scored the degree to which it was more attractive on an unmarked visual analog scale. There were no significant differences between either male and female raters or among panels in their assessments of the change in profile attractiveness in the whole sample. Neither were there significant differences between the change in profile attractiveness of the untreated subjects and the subjects treated with either Fränkel function regulators or Harvold activators. It is concluded that treatment with functional appliances does not lead to more attractive profiles than nontreatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11029730     DOI: 10.1067/mod.2000.109492

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  10 in total

1.  Identification of Maxillofacial Problems in Extraoral Photographs by Panel Members: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Yağmur Kılıçaslan; Türkan Sezen Erhamza; Ferabi Erhan Özdiler
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2019-03-01

2.  Influence of lower facial height changes on frontal facial attractiveness and perception of treatment need by lay people.

Authors:  Selin Kale Varlik; Evren Demirbaş; Metin Orhan
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  Effect of Class II functional treatment on facial attractiveness, as perceived by professionals and laypeople.

Authors:  Federica Santori; Francesco Masedu; Domenico Ciavarella; Edoardo Staderini; Claudio Chimenti; Michele Tepedino
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 4.  Orthodontic treatment for prominent upper front teeth (Class II malocclusion) in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Klaus Bsl Batista; Badri Thiruvenkatachari; Jayne E Harrison; Kevin D O'Brien
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-03-13

5.  Orthodontic Protocol Using Mini-Implant for Class II Treatment in Patient with Special Needs.

Authors:  Fernando Pedrin Carvalho Ferreira; Anderson Paulo Barbosa Lima; Eliana de Cássia Molina de Paula; Ana Claudia de Castro Ferreira Conti; Danilo Pinelli Valarelli; Renata Rodrigues de Almeida-Pedrin
Journal:  Case Rep Dent       Date:  2016-10-26

6.  Treatment decision in adult patients with class III malocclusion: surgery versus orthodontics.

Authors:  Sara Eslami; Jorge Faber; Ali Fateh; Farnaz Sheikholaemmeh; Vincenzo Grassia; Abdolreza Jamilian
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2018-08-02       Impact factor: 2.750

7.  Facial esthetic outcome of functional followed by fixed orthodontic treatment of class II division 1 patients.

Authors:  Mary-Eleni Zouloumi; Kleopatra Tsiouli; Simeon Psomiadis; Olga-Elpis Kolokitha; Nikolaos Topouzelis; Nikolaos Gkantidis
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 2.750

8.  The comparison of facial estethics between orthodontically treated patients and their parents.

Authors:  Sertac Aksakalli; Abdullah Demir
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2013-10-03

9.  Missing upper incisors: a retrospective study of orthodontic space closure versus implant.

Authors:  Abdolreza Jamilian; Letizia Perillo; Marco Rosa
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 2.750

10.  The association between patient's compliance and age with the bonding failure of orthodontic brackets: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Isabela Vasconcelos Barbosa; Victor de Miranda Ladewig; Renata Rodrigues Almeida-Pedrin; Mauricio Almeida Cardoso; Joel Ferreira Santiago Junior; Ana Claudia de Castro Ferreira Conti
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 2.750

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.