Literature DB >> 11029354

A noninvasive diagnostic strategy including spiral computed tomography in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism.

C Lorut1, M Ghossains, M H Horellou, A Achkar, J Fretault, J P Laaban.   

Abstract

We conducted a study to evaluate a noninvasive strategy including spiral computed tomography (CT) in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism (PE). We systematically performed spiral CT, ventilation/perfusion lung scanning, and D-dimer (DD) measurement (VIDAS test), and in some cases (with a normal CT with nondiagnostic lung scan and increased DD) performed venous ultrasonography (US) on 247 consecutive patients with clinically suspected PE in our hospital. Patients in whom PE was deemed absent were not given anticoagulants. All patients were followed for 3 mo. The prevalence of PE in the 228 patients who could be evaluated was 42% (96 of 228). PE was confirmed by spiral CT in 73% of the patients, by a high-probability lung scan in 4%, and by findings on US in 23%. PE was ruled out by a normal lung scan in 14% of the patients, by a normal DD concentration (< 500 ng/ml) in 31%, by an obvious differential diagnosis on spiral CT in 18%, by a similar prior lung scan in 11%, and by the combination of normal spiral CT findings, a nondiagnostic lung scan, a DD concentration > 500 ng/ml, and normal US in 26%. Pulmonary angiography was performed in only two patients, both of whom had a normal spiral CT scan and a high-probability lung scan, and was normal. The 3-mo risk of thromboembolism in patients not given anticoagulants, based on the results of the diagnostic protocol, was 1.7% (95% confidence interval: 1.5 to 2.3%). There were no deaths. The noninvasive strategy of combining spiral CT, lung scanning, DD measurement, and in some cases US, in patients with suspected PE yielded a definite diagnosis in 99% of patients, and appeared to be safe.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11029354     DOI: 10.1164/ajrccm.162.4.9909109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med        ISSN: 1073-449X            Impact factor:   21.405


  8 in total

1.  The non-invasive diagnosis of pulmonary embolus.

Authors:  A K Dixon; R A Coulden; A M Peters
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-08-25

2.  British Thoracic Society guidelines for the management of suspected acute pulmonary embolism.

Authors: 
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 9.139

3.  Pulmonary embolism: is multislice CT the method of choice? Against.

Authors:  Carl Schuemichen
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  Rate of computed tomography pulmonary angiographies (CTPA) positive for pulmonary embolism and predictive scores.

Authors:  M Albrizio; A Mizzi
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2007-10-21       Impact factor: 3.469

5.  Acute and Chronic Pulmonary Emboli.

Authors:  Peter F. Fedullo; Douglas M. Humber
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2001-04

Review 6.  [Acute cor pulmonale in pulmonary embolism. An important prognostic factor and a critical parameter for the choice of a therapeutic strategy].

Authors:  S Konstantinides; G Hasenfuss
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 0.743

Review 7.  Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Clive Kearon
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2003-01-21       Impact factor: 8.262

8.  The relationship between computed tomographic obstruction index and pulmonary vein cross-sectional area in acute pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Fethi Emre Ustabaşıoğlu; Serdar Solak; Osman Kula; Burak Gunay; Bilkay Serez; Nermin Tunçbilek
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2019-12-20       Impact factor: 3.469

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.