PURPOSE: Common oligosaccharides of cellular glycoconjugates are ligands for more than one type of endogenous lectin. Overlapping specificities to beta-galactosides of C-type lectins and galectins can reduce target selectivity of carbohydrate-ligand-dependent drug targeting. The purpose of this study is to explore distinct features of ligand presentation and structure for design of cluster glycosides to distinguish between asialoglycoprotein-specific (C-type) lectins and galectins. METHODS: Extent of binding of labeled sugar receptors to two types of matrix-immobilized (neo)glycoproteins and to cells was evaluated in the absence and presence of competitive inhibitors. This panel comprised synthetic mono-, bi-, and trivalent glycosides with two spacer lengths and galactose or lactose as ligand part. RESULTS: In contrast to C-type lectins of hepatocytes and macrophages, bi- and trivalent glycosides do not yield a notable glycoside cluster effect for galectins-1 and -3. Also, these Ca2+-independent galactoside-binding proteins prefer to home in on lactose-bearing glycosides relative to galactose as ligand, while spacer length requirements were rather similar. CONCLUSIONS: Trivalent cluster glycosides with Gal/GalNAc as ligand markedly distinguish between C-type lectins and galectins. Undesired side reactivities to galectins for C-type lectin drug delivery will thus be minimal.
PURPOSE: Common oligosaccharides of cellular glycoconjugates are ligands for more than one type of endogenous lectin. Overlapping specificities to beta-galactosides of C-type lectins and galectins can reduce target selectivity of carbohydrate-ligand-dependent drug targeting. The purpose of this study is to explore distinct features of ligand presentation and structure for design of cluster glycosides to distinguish between asialoglycoprotein-specific (C-type) lectins and galectins. METHODS: Extent of binding of labeled sugar receptors to two types of matrix-immobilized (neo)glycoproteins and to cells was evaluated in the absence and presence of competitive inhibitors. This panel comprised synthetic mono-, bi-, and trivalent glycosides with two spacer lengths and galactose or lactose as ligand part. RESULTS: In contrast to C-type lectins of hepatocytes and macrophages, bi- and trivalent glycosides do not yield a notable glycoside cluster effect for galectins-1 and -3. Also, these Ca2+-independent galactoside-binding proteins prefer to home in on lactose-bearing glycosides relative to galactose as ligand, while spacer length requirements were rather similar. CONCLUSIONS: Trivalent cluster glycosides with Gal/GalNAc as ligand markedly distinguish between C-type lectins and galectins. Undesired side reactivities to galectins for C-type lectin drug delivery will thus be minimal.
Authors: Jan Plzák; Zuzana Holíková; Barbora Dvoránková; Karel Smetana; Jan Betka; Jana Hercogová; Sem Saeland; Nicolai V Bovin; Hans-Joachim Gabius Journal: Histochem J Date: 2002-05
Authors: Harald Lahm; Sabine André; Andreas Hoeflich; Herbert Kaltner; Hans-Christian Siebert; Bernard Sordat; Claus-Wilhelm von der Lieth; Eckhard Wolf; Hans-Joachim Gabius Journal: Glycoconj J Date: 2004 Impact factor: 2.916
Authors: Christiane E Kupper; Ruben R Rosencrantz; Birgit Henßen; Helena Pelantová; Stephan Thönes; Anna Drozdová; Vladimir Křen; Lothar Elling Journal: Beilstein J Org Chem Date: 2012-05-09 Impact factor: 2.883
Authors: Maria del Carmen Fernández-Alonso; Dolores Díaz; Manuel Álvaro Berbis; Filipa Marcelo; Javier Cañada; Jesús Jiménez-Barbero Journal: Curr Protein Pept Sci Date: 2012-12 Impact factor: 3.272