Literature DB >> 11028670

Indirect bronchial hyperresponsiveness in asthma: mechanisms, pharmacology and implications for clinical research.

J Van Schoor1, G F Joos, R A Pauwels.   

Abstract

Bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR), an abnormal increase in airflow limitation following the exposure to a stimulus, is an important pathophysiological characteristic of bronchial asthma. Because of heterogeneity of the airway response to different stimuli, the latter have been divided into direct and indirect stimuli. Direct stimuli cause airflow limitation by a direct action on the effector cells involved in the airflow limitation, while indirect stimuli exert their action essentially on inflammatory and neuronal cells that act as an intermediary between the stimulus and the effector cells. This manuscript reviews the clinical and experimental studies on the mechanisms involved in indirect BHR in patients with asthma. Pharmacological stimuli (adenosine, tachykinins, bradykinin, sodium metabisulphite/sulphur dioxide, and propranolol) as well as physical stimuli (exercise, nonisotonic aerosols, and isocapnic hyperventilation) are discussed. The results of the different direct and indirect bronchial challenge tests are only weakly correlated and are therefore not mutually interchangeable. Limited available data (studies on the effects of allergen avoidance and inhaled corticosteroids) suggest that indirectly acting bronchial stimuli (especially adenosine) might better reflect the degree of airway inflammation than directly acting stimuli. It remains to be established whether monitoring of indirect BHR as a surrogate marker of inflammation (in addition to symptoms and lung function) is of clinical relevance to the long-term management of asthmatic patients. This seems to be the case for the direct stimulus methacholine. More work needs to be performed to find out whether, indirect stimuli are more suitable in asthma monitoring than direct ones. Recommendations on the application of indirect challenges in clinical practice and research will shortly be available from the European Respiratory Society Task Force.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11028670     DOI: 10.1034/j.1399-3003.2000.016003514.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Respir J        ISSN: 0903-1936            Impact factor:   16.671


  30 in total

1.  Prenatal secondhand cigarette smoke promotes Th2 polarization and impairs goblet cell differentiation and airway mucus formation.

Authors:  Shashi P Singh; Sravanthi Gundavarapu; Juan C Peña-Philippides; Jules Rir-Sima-ah; Neerad C Mishra; Julie A Wilder; Raymond J Langley; Kevin R Smith; Mohan L Sopori
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2011-09-19       Impact factor: 5.422

2.  Mechanism of adenosine-induced airways obstruction in allergic guinea pigs.

Authors:  Sandra Keir; Victoria Boswell-Smith; Domenico Spina; Clive Page
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 3.  Adenosine receptors and asthma.

Authors:  Constance N Wilson; Ahmed Nadeem; Domenico Spina; Rachel Brown; Clive P Page; S Jamal Mustafa
Journal:  Handb Exp Pharmacol       Date:  2009

4.  The effects of weather, air pollutants, and Asian dust on hospitalization for asthma in Fukuoka.

Authors:  Kayo Ueda; Hiroshi Nitta; Hiroshi Odajima
Journal:  Environ Health Prev Med       Date:  2010-05-25       Impact factor: 3.674

Review 5.  Methods for "indirect" challenge tests including exercise, eucapnic voluntary hyperpnea, and hypertonic aerosols.

Authors:  Sandra D Anderson; John D Brannan
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 8.667

6.  The role of sensory nerve endings in nerve growth factor-induced airway hyperresponsiveness to histamine in guinea-pigs.

Authors:  A de Vries; C van Rijnsoever; F Engels; P A Henricks; F P Nijkamp
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 8.739

7.  Perception of exercise induced asthma by children and their parents.

Authors:  S Panditi; M Silverman
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.791

8.  Pulmonary function tests, sputum induction, and bronchial provocation tests: diagnostic tools in the challenge of distinguishing asthma and COPD phenotypes in clinical practice.

Authors:  Efrossini Dima; Nikoletta Rovina; Christina Gerassimou; Charis Roussos; Christina Gratziou
Journal:  Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis       Date:  2010-09-07

9.  Dyspnea and wheezing after adenosine injection in a patient with eosinophilic bronchitis.

Authors:  Rodrigo Cartin-Ceba; Marie Christine Aubry; Kaiser Lim
Journal:  Case Rep Med       Date:  2009-11-08

10.  Cough and dyspnea during bronchoconstriction: comparison of different stimuli.

Authors:  Thais R Suguikawa; Clecia A Garcia; Edson Z Martinez; Elcio O Vianna
Journal:  Cough       Date:  2009-06-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.