Literature DB >> 11027925

Clinician, parent, and child prediction of medication or placebo in double-blind depression study.

C W Hughes1, G Emslie, R Kowatch, W Weinberg, J Rintelmann, A J Rush.   

Abstract

To evaluate how well a blind is maintained in a double-blind study. Clinicians (n = 66), parents (n = 62), and depressed child/adolescent subjects (n = 62) predicted whether the patient had been on either placebo or active medication at the end of an eight-week double-blind placebo versus fluoxetine trial. Clinician, patient and parents' guesses as to which treatment they had received were at a chance level based on an overall analysis. However, when clinical response and condition assignment were controlled, all were correctly predicting placebo treatment but not medication treatment. The finding that subjects, parents and clinicians predict at a chance level is important for double-blind study design integrity. However, clinicians, parents and subjects were accurately predicting placebo treatment when clinical response and the assigned condition were taken into account but not medication. Since they do not know condition however, all remain essentially blinded, and this is an important finding for design and analysis integrity for double-blind studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11027925     DOI: 10.1016/S0893-133X(00)00098-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology        ISSN: 0893-133X            Impact factor:   7.853


  6 in total

Review 1.  Efficacy and safety of antidepressants for children and adolescents.

Authors:  Jon N Jureidini; Christopher J Doecke; Peter R Mansfield; Michelle M Haby; David B Menkes; Anne L Tonkin
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-04-10

2.  Clinicians' predictions of patient response to psychotropic medications.

Authors:  Pierre Schulz; Patricia Berney
Journal:  Dialogues Clin Neurosci       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 5.986

3.  New generation antidepressants for depression in children and adolescents: a network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sarah E Hetrick; Joanne E McKenzie; Alan P Bailey; Vartika Sharma; Carl I Moller; Paul B Badcock; Georgina R Cox; Sally N Merry; Nicholas Meader
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-05-24

4.  Assessment of blinding in randomized controlled trials of antidepressants for depressive disorders 2000-2020: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yi-Hsuan Lin; Ethan Sahker; Kiyomi Shinohara; Noboru Horinouchi; Masami Ito; Madoka Lelliott; Andrea Cipriani; Anneka Tomlinson; Christopher Baethge; Toshi A Furukawa
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2022-07-01

Review 5.  Interventions for preventing relapse and recurrence of a depressive disorder in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Georgina R Cox; Caroline A Fisher; Stefanie De Silva; Mark Phelan; Olaoluwa P Akinwale; Magenta B Simmons; Sarah E Hetrick
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-11-14

Review 6.  Newer generation antidepressants for depressive disorders in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Sarah E Hetrick; Joanne E McKenzie; Georgina R Cox; Magenta B Simmons; Sally N Merry
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-11-14
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.