Literature DB >> 11027811

An experimental infection with classical swine fever in E2 sub-unit marker-vaccine vaccinated and in non-vaccinated pigs.

J Dewulf1, H Laevens, F Koenen, H Vanderhallen, K Mintiens, H Deluyker, A de Kruif.   

Abstract

The clinical and virological protection induced by an E2 sub-unit marker-vaccine against Classical Swine Fever (CSF) was examined during an experimental infection in vaccinated and non-vaccinated pigs. Forty-five pigs were equally distributed over three adjacent pens of an isolation unit, there was only indirect (airborne) contact between pigs in the different pens. In pen 3 all pigs were vaccinated twice with 4 weeks interval. Pigs in pens 1 and 2 were not vaccinated. Two weeks after booster vaccination, one randomly selected pig in the middle pen was experimentally inoculated with CSF virus. After the initial virus spread in the infected pen, all pigs in the non-vaccinated adjacent pen were infected. In the vaccinated pen, seven out of 14 pigs became infected during the experiment. Survival analysis showed that virus transmission by direct and indirect contact was significantly (p<0.001) delayed in vaccinated pigs as compared to non-vaccinated pigs. In the non-vaccinated pens over 40% of the pigs died and typical clinical signs were noticed. In the vaccinated pen no mortality and no clinical symptoms were observed. Although double vaccination with an E2 sub-unit marker-vaccine was able to prevent the clinical course of the disease it was unable to prevent infection through indirect contact. This finding combined with the slow serological response after vaccination will complicate the possible use of the vaccine in emergency vaccination programmes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11027811     DOI: 10.1016/s0264-410x(00)00189-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vaccine        ISSN: 0264-410X            Impact factor:   3.641


  7 in total

1.  Modelling the effectiveness and risks of vaccination strategies to control classical swine fever epidemics.

Authors:  Jantien A Backer; Thomas J Hagenaars; Herman J W van Roermund; Mart C M de Jong
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2008-12-03       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Production of classical swine fever virus envelope glycoprotein E2 as recombinant polyhedra in baculovirus-infected silkworm larvae.

Authors:  Kwang Sik Lee; Mi Ri Sohn; Bo Yeon Kim; Young Moo Choo; Soo Dong Woo; Sung Sik Yoo; Yeon Ho Je; Jae Young Choi; Jong Yul Roh; Hyun Na Koo; Byung Rae Jin
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.695

3.  An outbreak of classical swine fever in pigs in Bangladesh, 2015.

Authors:  Shamim Sarkar; Mohammad Enayet Hossain; Emily S Gurley; Rashedul Hasan; Mohammed Z Rahman
Journal:  Vet Med Sci       Date:  2017-11-20

4.  Effectiveness of the E2-classical swine fever virus recombinant vaccine produced and formulated within whey from genetically transformed goats.

Authors:  O Sánchez; M Barrera; O Farnós; N C Parra; E R Salgado; P A Saavedra; C D Meza; C I Rivas; M Cortez-San Martín; J R Toledo
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2014-10-01

Review 5.  Research Progress and Challenges in Vaccine Development against Classical Swine Fever Virus.

Authors:  Qiang Wei; Yunchao Liu; Gaiping Zhang
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 5.048

Review 6.  Classical Swine Fever-An Updated Review.

Authors:  Sandra Blome; Christoph Staubach; Julia Henke; Jolene Carlson; Martin Beer
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 5.048

7.  RLadyBug-An R package for stochastic epidemic models.

Authors:  Michael Höhle; Ulrike Feldmann
Journal:  Comput Stat Data Anal       Date:  2006-12-04       Impact factor: 1.681

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.