Literature DB >> 110275

Selective nonoperative management of contained intrathoracic esophageal disruptions.

J L Cameron, R F Kieffer, T R Hendrix, D G Mehigan, R R Baker.   

Abstract

Eight patients with intrathoracic esophageal disruptions were managed nonoperatively and without pleural drainage. Criteria for nonoperative treatment included the following: disruption contained in the mediastinum or between the mediastinum and visceral lung pleura; drainage of the cavity back into the esophagus; minimal symptoms; and minimal signs of clinical sepsis. Cause of the esophageal perforation was pneumostatic dilatation (1 patient), vomiting (2), and a leak following esophageal operation (5). Antibiotics were administered intravenously to all patients; hyperalimentation was accomplished intravenously in 5, and nasogastric suction was used in only 1. The cavities contracted and the esophageal leaks sealed in all instances. Time before oral intake was resumed ranged from 7 to 38 days (average, 18 days). Days until discharge ranged from 15 to 52 days (average, 28 days).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1979        PMID: 110275     DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(10)63335-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  68 in total

1.  Management of duodenal perforation after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and sphincterotomy.

Authors:  M Stapfer; R R Selby; S C Stain; N Katkhouda; D Parekh; N Jabbour; D Garry
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Intrathoracic leaks following esophagectomy are no longer associated with increased mortality.

Authors:  Linda W Martin; Stephen G Swisher; Wayne Hofstetter; Arlene M Correa; Reza J Mehran; David C Rice; Ara A Vaporciyan; Garrett L Walsh; Jack A Roth
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Esophageal perforation in adults: aggressive, conservative treatment lowers morbidity and mortality.

Authors:  Stephen B Vogel; W Robert Rout; Tomas D Martin; Patricia L Abbitt
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 4.  Hypopharyngeal perforation following minor trauma: a case report and literature review.

Authors:  D Smith; S Woolley
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.740

5.  Successful management of esophageal perforation diagnosed 3 days after injury caused by an explosion in the workplace: report of a case.

Authors:  Shigeaki Sawada; Akio Kusama; Naohiro Shimakage; Tadashi Tanabe; Takanao Okamura; Katsuyuki Uchida; Kazuhiro Tsukada; Kenzo Tajima
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.549

6.  Boerhaave's syndrome: primary repair vs. esophageal resection--case reports and meta-analysis of the literature.

Authors:  Otto Kollmar; Werner Lindemann; Sven Richter; Ingo Steffen; Georg Pistorius; Martin K Schilling
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2003 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 7.  Esophageal perforation: a research review of the anti-infective treatment.

Authors:  Jennifer Gregory; Jason Hecht
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2018-06-28

8.  [Spontaneous esophageal rupture after gastrointestinal examination using barium].

Authors:  R Masuda; I Tanaka; Y Furuhata; M Inoue; T Isoyama
Journal:  Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1998-11

9.  Experience with the Grillo pleural wrap procedure in 18 patients with perforation of the thoracic esophagus.

Authors:  T H Gouge; H J Depan; F C Spencer
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Expandable stents for iatrogenic perforation of esophageal malignancies.

Authors:  Russell E White; Caesar Mungatana; Mark Topazian
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2003 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.