Literature DB >> 11027201

How accurately do adult sons and daughters report and perceive parental deaths from coronary disease ?

G Watt1, A McConnachie, M Upton, C Emslie, K Hunt.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To describe how adult sons and daughters report and perceive parental deaths from heart disease
DESIGN: Two generation family study.
SETTING: West of Scotland.
SUBJECTS: 1040 sons and 1298 daughters aged 30-59 from 1477 families, whose fathers and mothers were aged 45-64 in 1972-76 and have been followed up for mortality over 20 years. OUTCOME: Perception of a "family weakness" attributable to heart disease.
RESULTS: 26% of sons and daughters had a parent who had died of coronary heart disease (CHD). The proportion was higher in older offspring (+18% per 10 year age difference) and in manual compared with non-manual groups (+37%). Eighty nine per cent of parental deaths from CHD were correctly reported by offspring. Only 23% of sons and 34% of daughters with at least one parent who had died of CHD considered that they had a family weakness attributable to heart disease. Perceptions of a family weakness were higher when one or both parents had died of CHD, when parental deaths occurred at a younger age, in daughters compared with sons and in offspring in non-manual compared with manual occupations.
CONCLUSIONS: Only a minority of sons and daughters with experience of a parent having died from CHD perceive this in terms of a family weakness attributable to heart disease. Although men in manual occupations are most likely to develop CHD, they are least likely to interpret a parental death from CHD in terms of a family weakness. Health professionals giving advice to patients on their familial risks need to be aware of the difference between clinical definitions and lay perceptions of a family history of heart disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11027201      PMCID: PMC1731587          DOI: 10.1136/jech.54.11.859

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health        ISSN: 0143-005X            Impact factor:   3.710


  11 in total

1.  Expanding the role of the family history in primary care.

Authors:  J Emery; P Rose
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Lay epidemiology and the rationality of responses to health education.

Authors:  S Frankel; C Davison; G D Smith
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 3.  The new genetics in clinical practice.

Authors:  J Bell
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-02-21

4.  The family history in family practice: a questionnaire study.

Authors:  N Summerton; P V Garrood
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 2.267

5.  Are perceptions of a family history of heart disease related to health-related attitudes and behaviour?

Authors:  K Hunt; C Davison; C Emslie; G Ford
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2000-04

6.  A comparison of positive family history definitions for defining risk of future disease.

Authors:  S C Hunt; R R Williams; G K Barlow
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1986

7.  Family history of heart attack as an independent predictor of death due to cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  E Barrett-Connor; K Khaw
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  A prospective study of parental history of myocardial infarction and coronary heart disease in women.

Authors:  G A Colditz; M J Stampfer; W C Willett; B Rosner; F E Speizer; C H Hennekens
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 4.897

9.  Cardiorespiratory disease in men and women in urban Scotland: baseline characteristics of the Renfrew/Paisley (midspan) study population.

Authors:  V M Hawthorne; G C Watt; C L Hart; D J Hole; G D Smith; C R Gillis
Journal:  Scott Med J       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 0.729

10.  Correction for biases in a population-based study of family history and coronary heart disease. The Newcastle Family History Study I.

Authors:  J S Silberberg; J Wlodarczyk; J Fryer; C D Ray; M J Hensley
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1998-06-15       Impact factor: 4.897

View more
  9 in total

1.  William Pickles lecture. General practice and the epidemiology of health and disease in families.

Authors:  Graham Watt
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 2.  Lay understanding of familial risk of common chronic diseases: a systematic review and synthesis of qualitative research.

Authors:  Fiona M Walter; Jon Emery; Dejana Braithwaite; Theresa M Marteau
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.166

3.  Using family history information to promote healthy lifestyles and prevent diseases; a discussion of the evidence.

Authors:  Liesbeth Claassen; Lidewij Henneman; A Cecile J W Janssens; Miranda Wijdenes-Pijl; Nadeem Qureshi; Fiona M Walter; Paula W Yoon; Danielle R M Timmermans
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 3.295

4.  Screening results for subclinical coronary artery calcification in asymptomatic individuals in relation to a detailed parental history of premature coronary heart disease.

Authors:  Stefanie Wahl; Stefan Möhlenkamp; Raimund Erbel; Susanne Moebus; Silke Andrich; Andreas Stang; Karl-Heinz Jöckel; Nico Dragano
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2012-11-04       Impact factor: 8.082

5.  Cancer family history reporting: impact of method and psychosocial factors.

Authors:  Kimberly M Kelly; Randi Shedlosky-Shoemaker; Kyle Porter; Amber Remy; Philip DeSimone; Michael A Andrykowski
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-02-23       Impact factor: 2.717

6.  Paternal and maternal history of myocardial infarction and cardiovascular diseases incidence in a Dutch cohort of middle-aged persons.

Authors:  Ineke van Dis; Daan Kromhout; Jolanda M A Boer; Johanna M Geleijnse; W M Monique Verschuren
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Can the cardiovascular family history reported by our patients be trusted? The Norwegian Stroke in the Young Study.

Authors:  H Øygarden; A Fromm; K M Sand; G E Eide; L Thomassen; H Naess; U Waje-Andreassen
Journal:  Eur J Neurol       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 6.089

8.  Bias of Two-Level Scalability Coefficients and Their Standard Errors.

Authors:  Letty Koopman; Bonne J H Zijlstra; Mark de Rooij; L Andries van der Ark
Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas       Date:  2019-05-14

9.  Like Parent, Like Child: Intergenerational Patterns of Cardiovascular Risk Factors at Midlife.

Authors:  Todd M Jensen; Naomi N Duke; Kathleen Mullan Harris; V Joseph Hotz; Krista M Perreira
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 5.012

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.