J M Robbins1, V Vaccarino, H Zhang, S V Kasl. 1. Population Studies Center, University of Pennsylvania, 3718 Locust Walk, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6298, USA. Jessica_Robbins@pop.upenn.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine whether socioeconomic status (SES) explains differences in the prevalence of type 2 diabetes between African-American and non-Hispanic white women and men. DESIGN: Cross sectional study of diabetes prevalence, SES, and other risk factors ascertained by physical examination and interview. SETTING: Interviews were conducted in subjects' homes; physical examinations were conducted in mobile examination centres. PARTICIPANTS: 961 African-American women, 1641 non-Hispanic white women, 839 African-American men and 1537 non-Hispanic white men, aged 40 to 74 years, examined in the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III), a representative sample of the non-institutionalised civilian population of the United States, 1988-1994. MAIN RESULTS: Among women, African-American race/ethnicity was associated with an age adjusted odds ratio of 1.76 (95% confidence intervals 1.21, 2.57), which was reduced to 1.42 (95% confidence intervals 0.95, 2.13) when poverty income ratio was controlled. Controlling for education or occupational status had minimal effects on this association. When other risk factors were controlled, race/ethnicity was not significantly associated with type 2 diabetes prevalence. Among men, the age adjusted odds ratio associated with African-American race/ethnicity was 1.43 (95% confidence intervals 1.03, 1.99). Controlling for SES variables only modestly affected the odds ratio for African/American race/ethnicity among men, while adjusting for other risk factors increased the racial/ethnic differences. CONCLUSIONS: Economic disadvantage may explain much of the excess prevalence of type 2 diabetes among African-American women, but not among men.
OBJECTIVE: To examine whether socioeconomic status (SES) explains differences in the prevalence of type 2 diabetes between African-American and non-Hispanic white women and men. DESIGN: Cross sectional study of diabetes prevalence, SES, and other risk factors ascertained by physical examination and interview. SETTING: Interviews were conducted in subjects' homes; physical examinations were conducted in mobile examination centres. PARTICIPANTS: 961 African-American women, 1641 non-Hispanic white women, 839 African-American men and 1537 non-Hispanic white men, aged 40 to 74 years, examined in the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III), a representative sample of the non-institutionalised civilian population of the United States, 1988-1994. MAIN RESULTS: Among women, African-American race/ethnicity was associated with an age adjusted odds ratio of 1.76 (95% confidence intervals 1.21, 2.57), which was reduced to 1.42 (95% confidence intervals 0.95, 2.13) when poverty income ratio was controlled. Controlling for education or occupational status had minimal effects on this association. When other risk factors were controlled, race/ethnicity was not significantly associated with type 2 diabetes prevalence. Among men, the age adjusted odds ratio associated with African-American race/ethnicity was 1.43 (95% confidence intervals 1.03, 1.99). Controlling for SES variables only modestly affected the odds ratio for African/American race/ethnicity among men, while adjusting for other risk factors increased the racial/ethnic differences. CONCLUSIONS: Economic disadvantage may explain much of the excess prevalence of type 2 diabetes among African-American women, but not among men.
Authors: B E Ainsworth; W L Haskell; A S Leon; D R Jacobs; H J Montoye; J F Sallis; R S Paffenbarger Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 1993-01 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Mario Sims; Ana V Diez Roux; Shawn Boykin; Daniel Sarpong; Samson Y Gebreab; Sharon B Wyatt; DeMarc Hickson; Marinelle Payton; Lynette Ekunwe; Herman A Taylor Journal: Ann Epidemiol Date: 2011-07-07 Impact factor: 3.797
Authors: Jaya L Padmanabhan; Pranav Nanda; Neeraj Tandon; Suraj S Mothi; Nicolas Bolo; Steven McCarroll; Brett A Clementz; Elliot S Gershon; Godfrey D Pearlson; John A Sweeney; Carol A Tamminga; Matcheri S Keshavan Journal: J Psychiatr Res Date: 2016-02-23 Impact factor: 4.791