Literature DB >> 11026890

Screening for HIV infection in genitourinary medicine clinics: a lost opportunity? British Co-operative Clinical Group.

.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To examine the policy and practice of HIV testing in genitourinary medicine clinics in the United Kingdom.
DESIGN: All 176 consultants in charge of genitourinary medicine clinics in the United Kingdom were sent a policy and practice questionnaire. A self selected group of 53 clinics conducted a retrospective case note survey of the first 100 patients seen in each clinic in 1998.
SETTING: Genitourinary medicine clinics in the United Kingdom.
SUBJECTS: Consultants in charge of, and case notes of patients attending, genitourinary medicine clinics.
INTERVENTIONS: None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Number of patients tested for HIV.
RESULTS: Consultants' assessments of their rate of HIV testing often exceeded the actual rates of testing in the clinic as a whole. The majority of patients deemed to be at high risk requested an HIV test. The exception were heterosexuals who had lived in sub-Saharan Africa. Among attenders at high risk of HIV who did not request a test, 57/196 (29%) were not offered one by clinic staff. Two fifths (51/130) of consultants felt the proportion of patients tested in their clinic was too low. The commonest reason given for this was a lack of time, especially that of health advisers.
CONCLUSIONS: A substantial minority of people with HIV infection attending genitourinary medicine clinics fail to have their infection diagnosed. Two major reasons were identified. Firstly, a test was not always offered to those at high risk of HIV. Secondly, a lack of resources, mainly staff, which prevents some clinics from increasing their level of testing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11026890      PMCID: PMC1744193          DOI: 10.1136/sti.76.4.307

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sex Transm Infect        ISSN: 1368-4973            Impact factor:   3.519


  5 in total

1.  Spectrum of disease in Africans with AIDS in London.

Authors:  J Del Amo; A Petruckevitch; A N Phillips; A M Johnson; J M Stephenson; N Desmond; T Hanscheid; N Low; A Newell; A Obasi; K Paine; A Pym; C M Theodore; K M De Cock
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 4.177

Review 2.  1998 revision to the British HIV Association guidelines for antiretroviral treatment of HIV seropositive individuals. BHIVA Guidelines Writing Committee.

Authors:  B Gazzard; G Moyle
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-07-25       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Issues facing Africans in London with HIV infection.

Authors:  A M McMunn; R Mwanje; A L Pozniak
Journal:  Genitourin Med       Date:  1997-06

4.  Prevalence of HIV-1 among attenders at sexually transmitted disease clinics: analyses according to country of birth.

Authors:  C A McGarrigle; A Nicoll
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 3.519

5.  Effect of HIV antibody disclosure on subsequent sexual activity in homosexual men.

Authors:  R Fox; N J Odaka; R Brookmeyer; B F Polk
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 4.177

  5 in total
  3 in total

1.  Uptake of HIV screening in genitourinary medicine after change to "opt-out" consent.

Authors:  Belinda Stanley; Jane Fraser; N H Cox
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-05-31

2.  HIV testing.

Authors:  Kaveh Manavi; Philip D Welsby
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-03-05

3.  Fear of venepuncture as a barrier to testing for blood-borne infection and use of an oral fluid test as an alternative to venepuncture in a genitourinary medicine clinic.

Authors:  H L McClean; A J Taylor; A M Mortimer
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2006-11-10       Impact factor: 3.519

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.