Literature DB >> 11026213

The uncritical acceptance of risk assessment in forensic practice.

R Rogers1.   

Abstract

Forensic psychologists are frequently asked to conduction evaluations of risk assessment. While risk assessment has considerable merit, recent applications to forensic psychology raise concerns about whether these evaluations are thorough and balanced. Forensic adult risk-assessment models stress risk factors, and deemphasize or disregard entirely the other side of the equation: protective factors. Mediating and moderating effects must also be considered. Moreover, base-rate estimates may produce erroneous results if applied imprudently to forensic samples without regard to their unstable prevalence rates or the far-reaching effects of settings, referral questions, and evaluation procedures. Psychologists are offered a preliminary list of relevant issues for evaluating the merits of risk assessment in their forensic practices.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11026213     DOI: 10.1023/a:1005575113507

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Law Hum Behav        ISSN: 0147-7307


  8 in total

1.  Taking Stock and Taking Steps: The Case for an Adolescent Version of the Short-Assessment of Risk and Treatability.

Authors:  Jodi L Viljoen; Keith R Cruise; Tonia L Nicholls; Sarah L Desmarais; Christopher Webster
Journal:  Int J Forensic Ment Health       Date:  2012-11-06

2.  Using dynamic risk and protective factors to predict inpatient aggression: reliability and validity of START assessments.

Authors:  Sarah L Desmarais; Tonia L Nicholls; Catherine M Wilson; Johann Brink
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2012-01-16

3.  Assessing protective factors of youth who sexually offended in singapore: preliminary evidence on the utility of the DASH-13 and the SAPROF.

Authors:  Gerald Zeng; Chi Meng Chu; Yirong Lee
Journal:  Sex Abuse       Date:  2014-12-18

4.  Violence risk assessment as a medical intervention: ethical tensions.

Authors:  Ashimesh Roychowdhury; Gwen Adshead
Journal:  Psychiatr Bull (2014)       Date:  2014-04

5.  Strength-based assessment for future violence risk: a retrospective validation study of the Structured Assessment of PROtective Factors for violence risk (SAPROF) Japanese version in forensic psychiatric inpatients.

Authors:  Hiroko Kashiwagi; Akiko Kikuchi; Mayuko Koyama; Daisuke Saito; Naotsugu Hirabayashi
Journal:  Ann Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 3.455

6.  Cannabis, a Significant Risk Factor for Violent Behavior in the Early Phase Psychosis. Two Patterns of Interaction of Factors Increase the Risk of Violent Behavior: Cannabis Use Disorder and Impulsivity; Cannabis Use Disorder, Lack of Insight and Treatment Adherence.

Authors:  Valerie Moulin; Philipp Baumann; Mehdi Gholamrezaee; Luis Alameda; Julie Palix; Jacques Gasser; Philippe Conus
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2018-07-04       Impact factor: 4.157

7.  Risk Assessment in Juvenile and Young Adult Offenders: Predictive Validity of the SAVRY and SAPROF-YV.

Authors:  Anneke T H Kleeven; Michiel de Vries Robbé; Eva A Mulder; Arne Popma
Journal:  Assessment       Date:  2020-09-23

8.  The Clinical Assessment in the Legal Field: An Empirical Study of Bias and Limitations in Forensic Expertise.

Authors:  Antonio Iudici; Alessandro Salvini; Elena Faccio; Gianluca Castelnuovo
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-11-30
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.