Literature DB >> 11025831

Risk of breast cancer with oral contraceptive use in women with a family history of breast cancer.

D M Grabrick1, L C Hartmann, J R Cerhan, R A Vierkant, T M Therneau, C M Vachon, J E Olson, F J Couch, K E Anderson, V S Pankratz, T A Sellers.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Oral contraceptive (OC) use is weakly associated with breast cancer risk in the general population, but the association among women with a familial predisposition to breast cancer is less clear.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the association between OC use and risk of breast cancer is influenced by family history of the disease. DESIGN AND
SETTING: Historical cohort study of 426 families of breast cancer probands diagnosed between 1944 and 1952 at the Tumor Clinic of the University of Minnesota Hospital. Follow-up data on families were collected by telephone interview between 1991 and 1996. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 394 sisters and daughters of the probands, 3002 granddaughters and nieces, and 2754 women who married into the families. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Relative risk (RR) of breast cancer associated with history of OC use by relationship to proband.
RESULTS: After accounting for age and birth cohort, ever having used OCs was associated with significantly increased risk of breast cancer among sisters and daughters of the probands (RR, 3.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.6-6.7), but not among granddaughters and nieces of the probands (RR, 1.2; 95% CI, 0.8-2.0) or among marry-ins (RR, 1.2; 95% CI, 0.8-1.9). Results were essentially unchanged after adjustment for parity, age at first birth, age at menarche, age at menopause, oophorectomy, smoking, and education. The elevated risk among women with a first-degree family history of breast cancer was most evident for OC use during or prior to 1975, when formulations were likely to contain higher dosages of estrogen and progestins (RR, 3.3; 95% CI, 1.5-7.2). A small number of breast cancer cases (n = 2) limited the statistical power to detect risk among women with a first-degree relative with breast cancer and OC use after 1975.
CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that women who have ever used earlier formulations of OCs and who also have a first-degree relative with breast cancer may be at particularly high risk for breast cancer. Further studies of women with a strong family history who have used more recent lower-dosage formulations of OCs are needed to determine how women with a familial predisposition to breast cancer should be advised regarding OC use today. JAMA. 2000;284:1791-1798.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Americas; Breast Cancer; Cancer; Cohort Analysis; Contraception; Contraceptive Methods; Developed Countries; Diseases; Evaluation; Family Planning; Minnesota; Neoplasms; North America; Northern America; Oral Contraceptives; Research Methodology; Research Report; Risk Assessment; United States

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11025831     DOI: 10.1001/jama.284.14.1791

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  22 in total

Review 1.  Combined hormonal contraceptives: prescribing patterns, compliance, and benefits versus risks.

Authors:  Jan Brynhildsen
Journal:  Ther Adv Drug Saf       Date:  2014-10

Review 2.  Understanding breast cancer risk -- where do we stand in 2005?

Authors:  R G Dumitrescu; I Cotarla
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2005 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 5.310

Review 3.  Exogenous reproductive hormone use in breast cancer survivors and previvors.

Authors:  Ines Vaz-Luis; Ann H Partridge
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-01-23       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 4.  Oral contraceptives and cancer: an update.

Authors:  C La Vecchia; A Altieri; S Franceschi; A Tavani
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 5.  Hereditary ovarian cancer in Ashkenazi Jews.

Authors:  Luis Robles-Díaz; Deborah J Goldfrank; Noah D Kauff; Mark Robson; Kenneth Offit
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.375

6.  Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Jacek Gronwald; Tomasz Byrski; Tomasz Huzarski; Oleg Oszurek; Anna Janicka; Jolanta Szymanska-Pasternak; Bohdan Górski; Janusz Menkiszak; Izabella Rzepka-Górska; Jan Lubinski
Journal:  Hered Cancer Clin Pract       Date:  2008-06-15       Impact factor: 2.857

7.  Assessing and managing breast cancer risk: clinical tools for advising patients.

Authors:  Bernard Friedenson
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2004-01-14

Review 8.  Reversible contraception update: the importance of long-acting reversible contraception.

Authors:  Renee E Mestad; Jessica Kenerson; Jeffrey F Peipert
Journal:  Postgrad Med       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.840

9.  Making sense of cancer risk calculators on the web.

Authors:  Andrea Gurmankin Levy; Seema S Sonnad; Jibby E Kurichi; Melani Sherman; Katrina Armstrong
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-01-11       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Effect of Oral Contraceptive Pills on the Blood Serum Enzymes and DNA Damage in Lymphocytes Among Users.

Authors:  Falaq Naz; Smita Jyoti; Nishat Akhtar; Yasir Hasan Siddique
Journal:  Indian J Clin Biochem       Date:  2015-12-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.