Literature DB >> 11025822

Should patients in quality-improvement activities have the same protections as participants in research studies?

S Cretin, E B Keeler, J Lynn, P B Batalden, D M Berwick, M Bisognano.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Health Care and Public Health

Mesh：

Year:  2000        PMID： 11025822

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN： 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


× No keyword cloud information.
  4 in total

Review 1.  A decision tool to guide the ethics review of a challenging breed of emerging genomic projects.

Authors:  Yann Joly; Derek So; Gladys Osien; Laura Crimi; Martin Bobrow; Don Chalmers; Susan E Wallace; Nikolajs Zeps; Bartha Knoppers
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 4.246

2.  Innovations in the Ethical Review of Health-Related Quality Improvement and Research: The Alberta Research Ethics Community Consensus Initiative (ARECCI).

Authors:  Brad Hagen; Maeve O'Beirne; Sunil Desai; Michael Stingl; Cathy Anne Pachnowski; Sarah Hayward
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2007-05

3.  When does quality improvement count as research? Human subject protection and theories of knowledge.

Authors:  J Lynn
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2004-02

Review 4.  Ethical oversight in quality improvement and quality improvement research: new approaches to promote a learning health care system.

Authors:  Kevin Fiscella; Jonathan N Tobin; Jennifer K Carroll; Hua He; Gbenga Ogedegbe
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 2.652
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.